StallionsModelT wrote:Sigh....
I don't know why we are doing this. In order for SMU to even be considered an expansion candidate there are so many things that need to go in our favor. We need to get both football and basketball at the Top 25 level. We need to probably add baseball and softball. We need to build additional facilities and facilities upgrades (those are going to happen soon). Oh yeah, and we need one of the P5 schools to decide that expansion should happen. Then we have to hope that programs currently higher on the totem pole such as BYU, Cincinnati, Memphis, UCONN, UCF, and Houston are either mired in their own mediocrity or worse.
The only thing we can do at this moment is win. If that happens and our momentum starts going in the right direction then we might have a chance.
My $.02
Never forget Rutgers in this conversation.
I think we all can agree adding additional sports and/or upgrades to facilities is a non-issue, it would never ever be an obstacle.
For a conference such as the Big12 or especially the SEC, our current lack of attendance may be less of a problem as the SEC brand would attract fans that UAB, Memphis, ECU, etc. could never in a million years do (same goes for Big12 south opponents).
For a west coast perspective, Dallas trumps Lubbock or Stillwater, no comparison.
You say Cincinnati, Memphis and others are ahead of us on the totem pole, I disagree. Once again, look at Rutgers.
My (kinda dream / most realistic) scenario, SMU & Houston as a package deal to the ACC