WTF? WHERE WERE THE STUDENTS TODAY?

by **SMU Football Blog** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 4:38 pm

Mustang_Matt wrote:Noted. The team's attitude was terrible and they did not play to their potential. Even so, consider that three of tulane's TDs came on short, short fields: 16, 24 and 34 yards.

Again. Improvement? That sounds like the last several years to me.

by **Mustang_Matt** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:04 pm

Again. Improvement? That sounds like the last several years to me.[/quote]

I suppose I'm looking back to the blowouts to mid-level teams over the past several seasons. We haven't seen that this year. Granted, we have four to go. We'll see.

by **jtstang** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:14 pm

Mustang_Matt wrote:I suppose I'm looking back to the blowouts to mid-level teams over the past several seasons. We haven't seen that this year. Granted, we have four to go. We'll see.

Well, you may want to draw the "which one is better" distinction between a 2-9 team that loses by an average of 30 and one that loses by an average of 14, but they both suck, so why bother?

by PK » Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:20 pm

Yaawwn...your rhetoric is getting boring jt.

by **jtstang** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:24 pm

PK wrote:Yaawwn...your rhetoric is getting boring jt.

So? You've shown that you can put up with boring over the last 16 years, anyway, as have I.....

WTF? WHERE WERE THE STUDENTS TODAY?

Who is online