Recruiting Perspective

[Dement-ed]

.... Kids don't all go through their growth spans at the same time nor is 18 necessarily the cut off for growth either be it in height or gerth.

I can vouch for that. I stopped growing taller during my sophomore year at SMU. As for my girth .... I'm still waiting for that growth to stop.

[PK]

Lankford is an OG not a DT. OL from last years class is Allison, Nigh-OTs, Lankford, Hickman, OGs, Enright-C.

Sorry, but he looked to me like he would make a great DT.

[BUS]

Ditto on the DT comment. I do not like to mention names but he was talked about in that position as even being able to play DT this year IF there was a bad injury.
Quick, Strong. One thing was to shorten the steps while close to the line to get more stability. That all says DT to me.

[EastStang]

I was looking at the CUSA chat room and they asked how many committments each school had. Several CUSA schools only had 2-3 committments. Perhaps, this year the big programs are leaving kids dangling longer, and they are slower to committ to the smaller Div. 1-A programs. Looking at some of the chatter on this line about this player and that player having OSU, UT, A&M and GA on their list and us, could very well mean that they end up here. Do I like getting their leftovers, NO, but that may be the reality this year for many mid-major programs.

[Dark Horse]

Careful -- you'll get jumped on for suggesting that all is not lost.

[SWC2010]

well then Enright has hit a growing spurt then because he was measured last year at I think 2 camps as 6'.05''. Lankford also was measured at 6-3 last year so I bet the logical conclusion is that you lie about your height. The SMU roster is laughable-they also have Tony Eckert at 6-2.

--------
Oh God, RIVALS.COM listed Enright @ 6ft. Take his scholarship!

Sorry. Stallion, but I met Mitch at the beginning of practice back in Aug. & he's pretty damn close to his 6'2" size.

[Hilltopper]

I saw some of the freshmen on the sideline when I came up to Dallas for home games. I think part of the deception in the height estimates is that Enright and Lankford have very different physiques. Enright is built like a lineman -- sort of barrel-shaped and thick. Lankford is bigger, but leaner -- if he ever bulks up to the point that he has the same proportionate shape that Enright has, you're going to be looking at a real monster. (And speaking of real monsters, #70 Allison is huge! And #72 Nigh is a little leaner, but he also looks like he's got the frame to grow into a beast. Nice prospects for future offensive linemen, at least physically.)