|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Water Pony » Fri Apr 17, 2015 3:51 pm
In my era, the Sixties, Freshman in all sports could not play, swim or run on a Varsity team. I would suggest that this is better for all. "Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany says making freshmen ineligible in college football and basketball could help correct the imbalance between athletics and academics" http://sports.yahoo.com/news/big-tens-d ... ncaaf.html
Pony Up
-

Water Pony

-
- Posts: 5512
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Chicagoland
by No Quarter » Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:02 pm
Water Pony wrote:In my era, the Sixties, Freshman in all sports could not play, swim or run on a Varsity team. I would suggest that this is better for all.l
It goes back further than the sixties, sir, although there was a temporary change during the Scfond World War. Maybe some sports historian can tell us just when the division between freshman and varsity teams was made, if not at the inception of intercollegiate sports. I don't know, myself.
-
No Quarter

-
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2000 4:01 am
by Pony Boss » Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:19 pm
Let them do that, would be great for other conferences
-

Pony Boss

-
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:22 pm
by Digetydog » Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:19 pm
Water Pony wrote:In my era, the Sixties, Freshman in all sports could not play, swim or run on a Varsity team. I would suggest that this is better for all. "Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany says making freshmen ineligible in college football and basketball could help correct the imbalance between athletics and academics" http://sports.yahoo.com/news/big-tens-d ... ncaaf.html
1) the rule would favor "rich" programs (B10) that could afford to park players for an extra year; 2) in revenue sports, the rule hurts players as they are forced to risk injury for a year before they can play. In addition, they would give up a year of eligibility; and 3) the rule favors strong programs by making it harder for weak programs to improve quickly. Rule: the Conference Commish represents the interests of the schools, not the athletes.
Do unto others before they do unto you!!
-

Digetydog

-
- Posts: 3913
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:33 am
by Digetydog » Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:24 pm
Water Pony wrote:In my era, the Sixties, Freshman in all sports could not play, swim or run on a Varsity team. I would suggest that this is better for all. "Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany says making freshmen ineligible in college football and basketball could help correct the imbalance between athletics and academics" http://sports.yahoo.com/news/big-tens-d ... ncaaf.html
In the mid-60's, UCLA BB's freshman team regularly thrashed the varsity squad (aka the National Champions) in scrimmages. The freshman had Lew Alcindor at center.
Do unto others before they do unto you!!
-

Digetydog

-
- Posts: 3913
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:33 am
by SMU 86 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:56 pm
Let them do it. That means others conferences that do not do it would be able to get freshmen that want to play immediately. Especially in hoops. No one wants to be parked for a year if they are a high caliber athlete.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown________________________ Champion________________________ 
-

SMU 86

-
- Posts: 12943
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:41 pm
by Stallion » Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:25 pm
I really don't know what the Big 10 is thinking-there is no way they can do this alone and no way a majority of big conferences will follow. Especially confused why they would suggest changes this year when several constructive, meaningful changes go into affect with regard to next years recruiting classes. Starting with recruits in the Class of 2016 some pretty long awaited, constructive changes in core courses and high school progress requirements are going to require a substantial number of the unprepared recruits to be mandatory freshman redshirts anyway. Why not see if these changes which are the most stringent in many decades will work before punishing qualified kids who are more prepared for college than Class ever before. Not all kids need the freshman redshirt-focus on those that do
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by ozfan » Fri Apr 17, 2015 11:14 pm
No Quarter wrote:Water Pony wrote:In my era, the Sixties, Freshman in all sports could not play, swim or run on a Varsity team. I would suggest that this is better for all.l
It goes back further than the sixties, sir, although there was a temporary change during the Scfond World War. Maybe some sports historian can tell us just when the division between freshman and varsity teams was made, if not at the inception of intercollegiate sports. I don't know, myself.
I was playing in the 50s and freshmen could not play. We made great practice dummies for the varsity and no 20 hour a week practice limit which could make for a long day.
Sent from my KOREAN knockoff using Tapdance 5
-
ozfan

-
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:43 pm
- Location: Melbourne Australia
by dr rc » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:28 am
translates to Big 10 wants to stop talented kids that used to be fine riding pine for two years from going to MAC/CUSA schools where they can play early and often on TV.
-
dr rc

-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:06 pm
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], mtrout and 10 guests
|
|