|
Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctionsModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
30 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctionsAnyone care to share? Must not be too drastic....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctionsI guess Rick needs to subscribe to the pay sites then since the NCAA contacts them first before relaying the penalties on to the school.
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctionsno they dont know anything
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctionsThe Shadow Knows! - but the Falcon has no clue.
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctions
![]()
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctionsProbably I should leave it to one of the lawyers to comment on this, but as a fan I think the NCAA action or lack of action malicious, if not criminal, so far as the effect on our BB program is concerned. The NCAA is hurting recruiting and the long run effect can't be good. Does it matter that our involvement with the NCAA is voluntary? Sixth Amendment anyone? Is it time to lawyer up? The long delay in it self is drastic.
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctionsTurner asked NCAA to wait until after 100 Year Homecoming Celebration- expect any day
now
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctions
No reason for him to do that unless it is worse than expected "I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctions
Well, its been more than 10 years since I've done litigation. . .but I can tell you there is absolutely no case here. No civil, no criminal, no nuthin'
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctionsReally don't think Turner or Hart knows what penalty is but he didn't want to take a chance of throwing cold water on his expensive celebration so he asked them to hold off.
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctionsHere we go
@ESPNAndyKatz: SMU to learn results of NCAA's investigation on Tuesday http://t.co/XaQZ4wAkHT
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctions
This is factually incorrect. Turner jointly presented to the Letterman's Board and Mustang Club Board and stated that he requested the NCAA Infractions Committee submit their ruling prior to their 12 week time frame in order for him to be able to address it when the Board of Trustees met the week of September 7th. He also disclosed this in multiple BoT subcommittee meetings that week. He wanted this over and done with and would never have requested this be delayed for a day. He definitely didn't want the uncertainty looming over him during the centennial. "This is . . . dedication to distraction by fans. Is that what I'm going to go with Jay?"
"That poor kid has to be wondering what is dad doing." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XknLDwj0dSo
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctions
Damn. Once again they have not specified which Tuesday. All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: Hart: still no word on NCAA sanctions
The football team's defense threw cold water quite adequately on the celebration. Probaly won't happen...BUT...maybe it will!!
30 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 2 guests |
|