PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Appeal looks less likely

Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby SMUstangs22 » Sat Oct 03, 2015 10:46 pm

Sometimes doing the right thing is what your customers do not want
. Or your employees. You do it because you know it is better for them in the long run
SMUstangs22
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2732
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 5:06 pm

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby Hoop Fan » Sat Oct 03, 2015 10:50 pm

i think you have to appeal. With Louisville about to hit the blocks, if you don't appeal you don't even have a chance to complain if they don't hammer Louisville. At least make them think twice.
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby gostangs » Sat Oct 03, 2015 10:51 pm

Regardless of how you come down on this, trust me...there is no appeal coming.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby SMUstangs22 » Sat Oct 03, 2015 10:54 pm

However, will we do nothing is the question...
SMUstangs22
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2732
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 5:06 pm

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby JasonB » Sat Oct 03, 2015 11:23 pm

NO appeal would be incredibly disappointing. Even the announcers today thought we should appeal and the ban would get overturned. They thought it was harsh.

If SMU does not appeal, everyone just assumes LB is a crook. And it will kill him in recruiting anyway, so you might as well appeal.

Also, everyone else is going to appeal. How stupid is it going to look when the 6 people after us all appeal and get reduced sentences, while little ole SMU just took it on the chin. There are NO points for that.

You only have one more year with Nic and MK (hopefully). You have to take advantage of that.

To me the only reason we don't appeal is because those guys already decided to transfer.
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7226
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby OhioBrownFan » Sun Oct 04, 2015 1:53 am

Talked to many people much more connected than me when it comes to this sort of [deleted] and it was near unanimous that SMU should appeal it. From a fan perspective, I'd rather push the ban to next year anyways given that the team won't be nearly as good since it will be reloading. That's my personal opinion but from an administrative/NCAA standpoint, most agreed that it should be appealed.
User avatar
OhioBrownFan
Heisman
 
Posts: 1733
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 3:25 pm

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby Phxfan » Sun Oct 04, 2015 5:32 am

If you guy's don't appeal, why do you even play? You will appeal. The legal stuff is minor. Play the UNC card, now Louisville card. Don't ever give up, ever.
Phxfan
All-American
 
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:51 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby ponyinNC » Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:26 am

We don't appeal this crap, I'm out. Seriously. The last straw in my book.

Everyone appeals. Everyone. Penn st appealed. Cuse appealed.

We have to fight for our BB future.
User avatar
ponyinNC
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4974
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:55 am
Location: Wrightsville Beach, N.C.

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby soccermom » Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:32 am

I don't see, or understand, why we wouldn't appeal. I think letters stating what ponyinNC said need to be written and sent to the powers that be.
User avatar
soccermom
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3356
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:48 am
Location: League City, Tx

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby gostangs » Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:37 am

You should let the admin know very soon how you feel about this. And I mean very soon.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby CoxMustangFan » Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:20 am

I actually understand the case to not appeal, but I would be very disappointed if we don't. It all comes down to what the seniors do. If they bolt, you don't appeal and you take it one the chin. Don't run the risk of screwing up next year, too.
Pony up!
User avatar
CoxMustangFan
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2432
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:02 pm
Location: Frisco, TX

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby PonySnob » Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:25 am

Unless we get the the conference automatic bid, seems like if we are appealing the ban, the NCAA committee could still keep us out of the tourney if we were an "at large" team.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Peruna is my mascot!
User avatar
PonySnob
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11516
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby gostangs » Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:42 am

In my book it's pretty simple. We may not have a team this strong for years. If the seniors agree to stay we appeal with goal to stretch I'd out past march. We take our lumps down the road in recruiting and possibly in 2017 tourny (if even relevant).

If they are leaving, then let's take the penalty now.

I'll take the for sure strong team over a maybe strong team.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby mustangxc » Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:52 am

Realistically I would hope an appeal can reduce the sanctions to 9 games for LB, 6 scholarships, no post-season ban.
User avatar
mustangxc
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7338
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm

Re: Appeal looks less likely

Postby DanFreibergerForHeisman » Sun Oct 04, 2015 9:06 am

Wow. I never even considered the possibility of not appealing. This will be pretty shocking if true.
Shake It Off Moody
User avatar
DanFreibergerForHeisman
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 16485
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 3:01 am

PreviousNext

Return to Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests