Pony147 wrote:footballdad wrote:But would have been better off if he had!

Kicking himself now. Wife telling him....'why the h*ll did you wait so long'?
Honest questions: How would the defense be performing if it were under (in your opinion) better leadership? Do you have a problem with the scheme or with Van (or a combination of both)? Do you think Van can learn from his mistakes and grow into a better coordinator?
I guess it would be impossible to perform any worse:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/sta ... totalYardsHonest answer, I haven't heard ONE person call for his replacement prior to the end of the season. Just a thorough & honest evaluation THIS YEAR, not 2017. Nobody is crucifying the guy, just making basic observations about blown coverages, blown run assignments, and what appears to be a lack of adjustments, which falls on the defensive staff. If there is no improvement, you can't just write off the rest of this season, and all of next season, waiting for 'talent' to save the day in 2017. Talent argument is fine against TCU & Baylor. Falls flat on it's face against JMU & ECU.
And where is all this talent that is going to step in and make an immediate impact? The last 2 classes have 8 combined 3 star recruits (rivals). 7 are offensive players and only 1 defensive player. Yes the staff is trying hard, and putting in the effort, but the reality is (on paper) our last 2 classes will be ranked middle of the road in the AAC.
Half this board questioned the hiring of a DC with great recruiting chops, but zero experience. Those questions are growing louder.
Fans and recruits are the opposite of patient.