PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Gutless -- Typical SMU

Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby Stallion » Mon Oct 12, 2015 12:00 pm

you guys can dance around the truth all you want -under the clear wording of the statute SMU committed a Level 1 violation "intended' to receive a competitive advantage. ("provides or is intended to provide") It doesn't have to result in an advantage-you only have to intend to receive a competitive advantage. The use of the term "or" makes this quite clear legally
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby EastStang » Mon Oct 12, 2015 12:12 pm

Even if it was a Level I violation, the Bylaw still says "MAY". It means the NCAA has the discretion to issue lesser punishments as well. Further, if we had Four Level I violations and it turns out it was only 1, then perhaps the punishment would have come under the "MAY" language. By not appealing all penalties we set ourselves up to win nothing. Its kind of like the Court instead of giving you consecutive sentences choosing instead to issue concurrent or suspending part of the sentence even if you are guilty because you cooperated with the cops or admitted fault. Here they just whacked us with the whole kitchen sink as non-discretionary.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12659
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby Rebel10 » Mon Oct 12, 2015 12:15 pm

Some were saying that the golf team did not commit a level 1 violation but the report says they did.
#HammerDown
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby mr. pony » Mon Oct 12, 2015 8:56 pm

Funny, isn't it, how whenever the NCAA comes up with new rules/penalties SMU gets to be the guinea pig? See that brand spanking new death penalty they tested out on us in '87.
mr. pony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby mr. pony » Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:24 pm

All this lawyer-talk is BS too.
You APPEAL THE D@MN BBALL POST-SEASON BAN AND GO TO THE STINKIN' SWEET 16 - MAYBE THE FF!!!!
TO HELL WITH THE REST OF IT!
MK, Nic and the rest deserved better.
mr. pony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby smupony94 » Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:28 pm

You are angry
User avatar
smupony94
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 25665
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Bee Cave, Texas

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby gostangs » Mon Oct 12, 2015 10:08 pm

He is angry and correct. we are wussies.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby Topper » Mon Oct 12, 2015 10:10 pm

Hoop Fan wrote:No way they would add to the punishment. If we are scared of that, then we truly are afraid of our own shadow.


We are afraid of our own shadow. Have been since we were put on probation for having the nerve to sign Ira Terrell in the early 70s. Everyone knows that SMU isn't supposed to recruit top players. I understand that argument that by taking our medicine now we can tell recruits that they will be eligible to go to the post season. But so what? The other schools are going to convince them that SMU is snakebit with the NCAA. Why take a chance of another infractions investigation at SMU?
User avatar
Topper
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:01 am
Location: 19th Hole

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby whitwiki » Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:05 am

The safest work hour is one you never work
User avatar
whitwiki
Heisman
 
Posts: 1497
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:22 pm

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby smusportspage » Tue Oct 13, 2015 9:10 am

EastStang wrote:Even if it was a Level I violation, the Bylaw still says "MAY". It means the NCAA has the discretion to issue lesser punishments as well. Further, if we had Four Level I violations and it turns out it was only 1, then perhaps the punishment would have come under the "MAY" language. By not appealing all penalties we set ourselves up to win nothing. Its kind of like the Court instead of giving you consecutive sentences choosing instead to issue concurrent or suspending part of the sentence even if you are guilty because you cooperated with the cops or admitted fault. Here they just whacked us with the whole kitchen sink as non-discretionary.

I have to agree with you on this. I have not brought this up, because I wanted to give the school the benefit of the doubt on this (silly me). But did we use in house lawyers for the initial phase of the investigation? Did we use outside attorneys to review the appeal process? To me, outside counsel with proven history of dealing with the NCAA would have been the way to go from the get go.
smusportspage
Heisman
 
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:00 pm

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby gostangs » Tue Oct 13, 2015 10:22 am

Bing Bing Bing. We have a winner

To have handled initially internally is hopelessly naive. I am sure someone said, let's not lawyer up - it looks defensive. Meanwhile NCAA was sharpening their fangs.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby SMUer » Sat Oct 17, 2015 8:28 am

SMU Athletics makes me sad.
User avatar
SMUer
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5276
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas, The United States of America

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby Pony64 » Sat Oct 17, 2015 10:03 am

mr. pony wrote:All this lawyer-talk is BS too.
You APPEAL THE D@MN BBALL POST-SEASON BAN AND GO TO THE STINKIN' SWEET 16 - MAYBE THE FF!!!!
TO HELL WITH THE REST OF IT!
MK, Nic and the rest deserved better.


Dam right
Pony64
Varsity
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:06 pm

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby Topper » Sat Oct 17, 2015 1:52 pm

Pony64 wrote:
mr. pony wrote:All this lawyer-talk is BS too.
You APPEAL THE D@MN BBALL POST-SEASON BAN AND GO TO THE STINKIN' SWEET 16 - MAYBE THE FF!!!!
TO HELL WITH THE REST OF IT!
MK, Nic and the rest deserved better.


Dam right


Mr. Pony is right. But if Hoopmax is right,and this whole capitulation is nothing but a cover up of something much deeper and worse, then the whole truth should be made public to the supporters of SMU and the whole bunch should be fired.
User avatar
Topper
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:01 am
Location: 19th Hole

Re: Gutless -- Typical SMU

Postby smupony94 » Sat Oct 17, 2015 2:18 pm

Free hugs from Larry for the butt hurt on the boulevard the next home game
User avatar
smupony94
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 25665
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Bee Cave, Texas

PreviousNext

Return to Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests