|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by smusic 00 » Wed Nov 04, 2015 3:58 pm
MustangStealth wrote:ReedFrawg wrote:FYI from TCU board... Vegas Rankings (Top 10 CFB teams according to Vegas) 1) Ohio St 2) Alabama 3) TCU 4) Baylor 5) Clemson 6) LSU 7) Michigan St  Oklahoma 9) Stanford 10) Florida Vegas is unbiased.
Who is "Vegas"? The first three sports book sites that came up on Google had TCU 9th, 5th, and 9th.
Vegas is whoever has the frogs the highest. All rankings are biased, by definition. They are favoring certain teams over others based on particular biases. It could be number over wins or most yards or whatever, but it's a bias towards one squad over another.
-

smusic 00

-
- Posts: 6912
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:15 pm
- Location: Downtown
by ReedFrawg » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:00 pm
Bama lost at home to a 2 loss team. This whole setup is a joke...just as much for the G5 as anyone. Have to push for 8 teams, 5 conf champs plus highest ranked G5 and 2 at large.
-
ReedFrawg

-
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Fort Worth, TX, US
by smusic 00 » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:12 pm
It's still early.
-

smusic 00

-
- Posts: 6912
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:15 pm
- Location: Downtown
by mrydel » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:20 pm
ReedFrawg wrote:Bama lost at home to a 2 loss team. This whole setup is a joke...just as much for the G5 as anyone. Have to push for 8 teams, 5 conf champs plus highest ranked G5 and 2 at large.
Have to disagree. Look at the discussion already taking place. It would be much more muted with 8., especially with conference champs. You do not want a weak conference champ to take the place of more deserving. The Big 12(10) just needs to man up and have a championship game and honestly have one true champion.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by ReedFrawg » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:22 pm
mrydel wrote:ReedFrawg wrote:Bama lost at home to a 2 loss team. This whole setup is a joke...just as much for the G5 as anyone. Have to push for 8 teams, 5 conf champs plus highest ranked G5 and 2 at large.
Have to disagree. Look at the discussion already taking place. It would be much more muted with 8., especially with conference champs. You do not want a weak conference champ to take the place of more deserving. The Big 12(10) just needs to man up and have a championship game and honestly have one true champion.
That's fine with me but a championship game doesn't fix the problem. Win your conference and you are in.
-
ReedFrawg

-
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Fort Worth, TX, US
by mrydel » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:24 pm
You would go crazy if you had a year like last year, 8 teams, and you were left out due to a 3 loss ACC conference champion.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by Pony Boss » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:40 pm
ReedFrawg wrote:Bama lost at home to a 2 loss team. This whole setup is a joke...just as much for the G5 as anyone. Have to push for 8 teams, 5 conf champs plus highest ranked G5 and 2 at large.
This. Move to 8 team playoffs.
-

Pony Boss

-
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:22 pm
by mrydel » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:50 pm
I used to think that way, but 4 is beautiful. Forces teams to up their competition and has people screaming from the first day the first list is announced. None of this discussion takes place if you go to conference champs.
My only dislike is the human factor in the selection committee, but that will not ever go away until they decide to let the computers have the final say.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by MustangStealth » Wed Nov 04, 2015 5:08 pm
Make it 32 teams.
10 conference champs 8 divisional champs/conference runners-up 1 independent 9 at large 1 wildcard for the team with the coolest alternate uniform 2 drawn at random from a bucket 1 SMU
-

MustangStealth

-
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible
by Dukie » Wed Nov 04, 2015 6:21 pm
mrydel wrote:You would go crazy if you had a year like last year, 8 teams, and you were left out due to a 3 loss ACC conference champion.
Sorry, even if FSU had had three losses instead of zero going into the playoff last year, how exactly would Baylor/TCU, under the committee's rankings, not been in the playoff as Big "12" champion and the first at-large team? My take on four is that yes, it creates a ton of drama and a feeling of urgency--but only around who Barry Alvarez and company think is #4 versus #5. I'd much rather have the drama of fourth-seeded Ohio State facing off on the field against fifth-seeded Baylor than the drama of "What will the committee do with five P5 conferences [plus an occasional Memphis/Boise] and four slots?!?" I follow FCS closely most years. FCS started with a 4-team playoff, then 12, then 16, now 24. Each time that happens, the drama over who is selected goes down, because the first team left out at #5 is much angrier about it and has much better season results than the first team left out at #13, and so on. I have no problem with replacing committee drama with on-the-field results, particularly in going from 4 to 8 teams. I don't think you can go beyond 8 for schedule reasons at the FBS level. And if we had had an 8-team playoff last year, the first team left out, based on the committee's final rankings, would have been three-loss Ole Miss. That is a lot different than leaving out Baylor and TCU (and the other two in, assuming two at-large and one G5 guarantee, would have been #7 Mississippi State and #20 Boise).
-
Dukie

-
- Posts: 2268
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Austin, Texas
by CalallenStang » Wed Nov 04, 2015 7:19 pm
ReedFrawg wrote:Bama lost at home to a 2 loss team. This whole setup is a joke...just as much for the G5 as anyone. Have to push for 8 teams, 5 conf champs plus highest ranked G5 and 2 at large.
10 Conference Champs or no auto-bids. Time to end the caste system.
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
by East Coast Mustang » Wed Nov 04, 2015 7:23 pm
People get too bent out of shape about these rankings so early, though. I think Ohio State was #16 in the inaugural poll last year, and Mississippi State was #1. Teams who are deserving will have plenty of opportunities to prove themselves in the coming weeks
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
-

East Coast Mustang

-
- Posts: 7431
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am
by Pony Boss » Wed Nov 04, 2015 7:27 pm
MustangStealth wrote:Make it 32 teams.
10 conference champs 8 divisional champs/conference runners-up 1 independent 9 at large 1 wildcard for the team with the coolest alternate uniform 2 drawn at random from a bucket 1 SMU
This. SMU needs an automatic berth.
-

Pony Boss

-
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:22 pm
by PSCA » Wed Nov 04, 2015 9:39 pm
A lot of football left ... this will change. Many in the top 10 still have to play each other ... OSU has Mich-State and Mich back-back and on the road ... Ala-LSU ... Baylor-TCU ... OSU-OU etc. etc. Too early to worry with.
-
PSCA

-
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 2:19 pm
by West Coast Johnny » Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:32 pm
mrydel wrote:The Big 12(10) just needs to man up and have a championship game and honestly have one true champion.
Ten team conferences are awesome. Regional football. Home & home basketball. Everyone plays everyone. Big 12 right now is the only conference that has things right - but sadly, market forces and money has forced mega conferences on us and we will have to endure Nebraska versus Rutgers & South Carolina versus Texas A&M.
-
West Coast Johnny

-
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:30 pm
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests
|
|