Lobster?

by **mrydel** » Sun Nov 15, 2015 9:43 pm

I specialize in chipmunks

by **mrydel** » Sun Nov 15, 2015 9:44 pm

by **LA_Mustang** » Sun Nov 15, 2015 9:54 pm

SMU15 wrote:Someone in the Mob tried to organize "Free Larry" shirts, but the NCAA didn't like it.

Okay. Hopefully they can come up with something else creative. The Duke students would.

by **smusic 00** » Sun Nov 15, 2015 10:24 pm

mrydel wrote:

A star is born!

by **Junior** » Sun Nov 15, 2015 11:32 pm

SMU15 wrote:
LA_Mustang wrote:I thought for sure we'd see some type of "free LB" signage.

Someone in the Mob tried to organize "Free Larry" shirts, but the NCAA didn't like it.

I got a call from the t-shirt company that the NCAA doesn't want us to have shirts with their name on it, so the t-shirt company couldn't ship them out.

If we want these t-shirts, we would have to redo the backs ASAP!

Sorry that they couldn't be here for the first game. This is just further proof that the NCAA sucks!

What would they do? Sue the students? Bring on the shirts. The big schools would. We have already been punished. What more could they do? Seriously, I don't see how the school could get punished over this. Don't puss out now.

by **CalallenStang** » Sun Nov 15, 2015 11:39 pm

Apparently they objected to using "NCAA" on the shirts. Just omit that part and print them

by **whitwiki** » Mon Nov 16, 2015 7:29 am

They would sue the printing company most likely.

by **mrydel** » Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:23 am

How about

"Bring in the other brother Larry"

by **sadderbudweiser** » Mon Nov 16, 2015 11:19 am

LA_Mustang wrote:
SMU15 wrote:Someone in the Mob tried to organize "Free Larry" shirts, but the NCAA didn't like it.

Who the f*** asked THEM?

by **gostangs** » Mon Nov 16, 2015 11:42 am

I believe free speech rights would not allow them to squelch this. I bet there is a printer who would be happy to print that shirt.

by **CalallenStang** » Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:19 pm

They can not squelch anything except the use of their trademarks which is what it looks like they objected to (note it says they objected to their name being used, not the Free Larry message)

by **smupony94** » Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:40 pm

gostangs wrote:I believe free speech rights would not allow them to squelch this. I bet there is a printer who would be happy to print that shirt.

And he would be sued for trademark infringement like Cal is saying

by **Bergermeister** » Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:59 pm

coloradoStang wrote: I heard that lobster was tried to be passed down but no one wanted it.

I imagine it had quite an "aroma".

by **SMUer** » Mon Nov 16, 2015 5:54 pm

Tshirt company can't print anything that requires a license. They likely have to call the NCAA to approve it. Legal action would go to Tshirt company if they printed without approval, I believe.

by **smusic 00** » Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:10 am

Yup. If you make the shirts yourself and give them away you may be ok under 1st amendment but if a company sells them they are infringing on the licensing and trademark rights without permission.

Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Re: Lobster?

Who is online