|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Topper » Thu Dec 24, 2015 2:18 am
allbuffs.com. Im not posting link but here is 10 Cent tour of their comments:
1. They were sunk by poor FT shooting. 2. SMU is much quicker 3. SMU crowd size and noise pisses them off 4. SMU got all the calls because they are ranked 5. Larry is a good coach 6. Nic is amazing 7. SMU had an advantage because SMU cheats 8. SMU will go far in the tournament 9. SMU is not going to be in the tournament
-

Topper

-
- Posts: 2304
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: 19th Hole
by smusic 00 » Thu Dec 24, 2015 2:49 am
Good stuff!
-

smusic 00

-
- Posts: 6912
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:15 pm
- Location: Downtown
by mr. pony » Thu Dec 24, 2015 7:19 am
Topper wrote:allbuffs.com. Im not posting link but here is 10 Cent tour of their comments:
1. They were sunk by poor FT shooting. 2. SMU is much quicker 3. SMU crowd size and noise pisses them off 4. SMU got all the calls because they are ranked 5. Larry is a good coach 6. Nic is amazing 7. SMU had an advantage because SMU cheats 8. SMU will go far in the tournament 9. SMU is not going to be in the tournament
As for No. 9, SMU has its best team in, what, 60 years - and its going NOWHERE because the school refused to appeal the ridiculous post-season ban. Sorry, but I can't get into it.
-
mr. pony

-
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm
by LA_Mustang » Thu Dec 24, 2015 8:14 am
mr. pony wrote:As for No. 9, SMU has its best team in, what, 60 years - and its going NOWHERE because the school refused to appeal the ridiculous post-season ban. Sorry, but I can't get into it.
Adios. It has been discussed a million times why it was handled the way it was. Either you just don't get it, or you can't read. Go follow the equestrian team.
SMU-12 NCAA appearances, 1 Final Four 2014-15 & 2016-17 AAC Men's Basketball Champs
-

LA_Mustang

-
- Posts: 15604
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: El Porto, CA 90266
by gostangs » Thu Dec 24, 2015 8:29 am
I thought it was a mistake at first also, but watching the new talent makes me realize it is best for the program not to trail this out. So I admit I was wrong. Tough decision but the right one.
It has been done to death though, so let's just have fun watching a great team do what they love to do.
-
gostangs

-
- Posts: 12315
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas USA
by Topper » Thu Dec 24, 2015 8:42 am
I should have added a Number 10 to my list in Letterman style, but this is just my observation of their attitude: The CU fans griped about their poor FT shooting and were complimentary of their 3 pt play, but they didn't seem to understand that the craziness of their long distance accuracy won't happen every game.
-

Topper

-
- Posts: 2304
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: 19th Hole
by PonySnob » Thu Dec 24, 2015 9:17 am
They just got beat by the better team
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Peruna is my mascot!
-

PonySnob

-
- Posts: 11516
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by whitwiki » Thu Dec 24, 2015 9:32 am
mr. pony wrote:Topper wrote:allbuffs.com. Im not posting link but here is 10 Cent tour of their comments:
1. They were sunk by poor FT shooting. 2. SMU is much quicker 3. SMU crowd size and noise pisses them off 4. SMU got all the calls because they are ranked 5. Larry is a good coach 6. Nic is amazing 7. SMU had an advantage because SMU cheats 8. SMU will go far in the tournament 9. SMU is not going to be in the tournament
As for No. 9, SMU has its best team in, what, 60 years - and its going NOWHERE because the school refused to appeal the ridiculous post-season ban. Sorry, but I can't get into it.
you should make a cartoon about it. Be sure to label everything clearly.
-

whitwiki

-
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:22 pm
by Rebel10 » Thu Dec 24, 2015 9:49 am
gostangs wrote:I thought it was a mistake at first also, but watching the new talent makes me realize it is best for the program not to trail this out. So I admit I was wrong. Tough decision but the right one.
It has been done to death though, so let's just have fun watching a great team do what they love to do.
The team would have played well regardless of if they had appealed or not.
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by Pony_Law » Thu Dec 24, 2015 10:03 am
Honestly though SMU was the one getting the wrong end of the calls. There were a lot of no calls against us on the glass and Ben Moore's 4th foul was a complete joke.
-
Pony_Law

-
- Posts: 2873
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:07 pm
by Stangs1970 » Thu Dec 24, 2015 10:11 am
We do not know all the story behind challenging the post season ban. I will say it is more important to get scholarships back and we challenged that issue.
I hate the galactically unfair NCAA. NC runs a 20 year grade scam and gets nothing.
-
Stangs1970

-
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:39 pm
by sadderbudweiser » Thu Dec 24, 2015 10:18 am
LA_Mustang wrote:mr. pony wrote:As for No. 9, SMU has its best team in, what, 60 years - and its going NOWHERE because the school refused to appeal the ridiculous post-season ban. Sorry, but I can't get into it.
Adios. It has been discussed a million times why it was handled the way it was. Either you just don't get it, or you can't read. Go follow the equestrian team.
With a shovel.
Party at The Wopper!
-
sadderbudweiser

-
- Posts: 6069
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 6:58 am
- Location: East Hampton, NY
by Pony_Law » Thu Dec 24, 2015 10:32 am
Stangs1970 wrote:We do not know all the story behind challenging the post season ban. I will say it is more important to get scholarships back and we challenged that issue.
I hate the galactically unfair NCAA. NC runs a 20 year grade scam and gets nothing.
Yea UNC cheats for 20 years, there is a credible whistle blower, UNC admits to it, and NCAA does nothing after what 2+ years? They have basically said the problem was so big and wide spread its an institution issue not athletic so we as the NCAA can't do anything. What a joke.
-
Pony_Law

-
- Posts: 2873
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:07 pm
by Terry Webster » Thu Dec 24, 2015 10:32 am
I am sure that Nic would disagree with the call complaint after he got run over in the lane and there was no call.
-
Terry Webster

-
- Posts: 4501
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 4:01 am
- Location: Fort Thomas, KY
by ponyboy » Thu Dec 24, 2015 10:58 am
Pony_Law wrote:Stangs1970 wrote:We do not know all the story behind challenging the post season ban. I will say it is more important to get scholarships back and we challenged that issue.
I hate the galactically unfair NCAA. NC runs a 20 year grade scam and gets nothing.
Yea UNC cheats for 20 years, there is a credible whistle blower, UNC admits to it, and NCAA does nothing after what 2+ years? They have basically said the problem was so big and wide spread its an institution issue not athletic so we as the NCAA can't do anything. What a joke.
It's actually quite infuriating.
-
ponyboy

-
- Posts: 15134
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: University Park,TX US
Return to Basketball
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests
|
|