SMU may be named in lawsuit

by **mrydel** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 9:15 pm

Word is SMU may be hit with a lawsuit for false advertising. Tiger J has been entered as evidence that there is such thing as a lesser person. We are toast.

by **CalallenStang** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 11:10 pm

mrydel wrote:Tiger J has been entered as evidence that there is such thing as a lesser person.

A++++++++++

by **Arkpony** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 11:13 pm

Make sure it is assigned to my court.

by **Dukie** » Sun Jan 31, 2016 9:24 am

Well played, tying in the broadcast promo and all!

by **PoconoPony** » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:10 pm

mrydel wrote:Word is SMU may be hit with a lawsuit for false advertising. Tiger J has been entered as evidence that there is such thing as a lesser person. We are toast.

Scopes trial was in Tennessee.

by **mrydel** » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:17 pm

At least we got a decent mouthwash out of it.

by **leopold** » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:39 pm

Christ this thread worried me.

I thought we were going to be the next Baylor.

SMU may be named in lawsuit

SMU may be named in lawsuit

Re: SMU may be named in lawsuit

Re: SMU may be named in lawsuit

Re: SMU may be named in lawsuit

Re: SMU may be named in lawsuit

Re: SMU may be named in lawsuit

Re: SMU may be named in lawsuit

Who is online