What seed for SMU

by **Terry Webster** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:44 am

Where do you think we would have placed? It is tough to decide since we don't know how we would have done in the AAC tourney, but my best guess would that we would have gotten a 7 seed.

by **ojaipony** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:53 am

If tanked in AAC tourney (bounced in first game), 7 seed.

If lost in semis, 6 seed (maybe 7).

if lost in aac finals, 5 seed. (maybe 6)

if won the aac, 4 seed.

by **gostangs** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:58 am

5 or 6 I would say.

by **smupony94** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 10:02 am

Where would SMU have been seeded if it were eligible for the NCAA Tournament?
http://sportsday.dallasnews.com//smumus ... tournament

by **LA_Mustang** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 11:29 am

Second time I fell for that. Link not working - something went terribly wrong.

I believe we would have been a 5 or 6 seed.

by **smupony94** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 11:30 am

LA_Mustang wrote:Second time I fell for that. Link not working - something went terribly wrong.

I believe we would have been a 5 or 6 seed.

Dallas News trolling us

by **mrydel** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 11:33 am

Scroll down and click on colleges and then scroll until you find the article. It is there.

by **LA_Mustang** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 11:43 am

Thanks. That worked. mrydel, we need to add IT guru to your list of skills.

by PK » Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:01 pm

Try this direct link instead:

http://sportsday.dallasnews.com/college ... nament?f=r

by **mrydel** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:08 pm

LA_Mustang wrote:Thanks. That worked. mrydel, we need to add IT guru to your list of skills.

Haha. I am still pondering as to whether or not computers will catch on.

by **LA_Mustang** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:25 pm

Just a fad. The Internet, too.

by **Arkpony** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:20 pm

The article said "..a number of infractions." I thought we only had ONE infraction.

by **sadderbudweiser** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:43 pm

[quote="Arkpony"]The article said "..a number of infractions." I thought we only had ONE infraction.[/quote

Well.... One IS a number.

by **smupony94** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:45 pm

We also were on probation for previous infractions

by **Blunt Pony** » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:15 pm

I think we would have come in at a 3 or 4 seed. 5 seed at worst. You have to remember that many pollsters left us off their list or just did not rank us where we deserved to be ranked due to the probation bias. Had we not been on probation and these voters voted as they should, I think we would have finished in the top 15 before the conference tourney.

What seed for SMU

What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Re: What seed for SMU

Who is online