|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by 1983 Cotton Bowl » Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:36 pm
They would certainly like to think so!
-

1983 Cotton Bowl

-
- Posts: 1745
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 2:17 pm
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
by Digetydog » Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:43 pm
Although it is a point to argue, I doubt that it gets Memphis out of the contract.
1) It doesn't appear that the relationship was a secret; 2) If the AD was no longer represented by the agent, it is almost certainly not a problem; 3) I would bet $100 that UM had its own lawyer(s) and/or consultants that advised them on the contract; and 4) UM is a public university. Final say on contracts like Pastner's would almost certainly need to be approved by the "Board." Unless something very strange happened, (the AD lied to them or there were hidden terms in the contract) I think thier approval controls.
Do unto others before they do unto you!!
-

Digetydog

-
- Posts: 3913
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:33 am
by max the wonder dog » Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:53 pm
Digetydog wrote:Although it is a point to argue, I doubt that it gets Memphis out of the contract.
1) It doesn't appear that the relationship was a secret; 2) If the AD was no longer represented by the agent, it is almost certainly not a problem; 3) I would bet $100 that UM had its own lawyer(s) and/or consultants that advised them on the contract; and 4) UM is a public university. Final say on contracts like Pastner's would almost certainly need to be approved by the "Board." Unless something very strange happened, (the AD lied to them or there were hidden terms in the contract) I think thier approval controls.
The stories on the contract issue have only reported that the university president at the time (now retired) signed the contract. There has been no mention of the state board overseeing the university approving it though, as I recall, their approval was needed to hire the new university president.
-

max the wonder dog

-
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:24 am
- Location: Our Nation's Capital
by CA Mustang » Tue Mar 22, 2016 6:10 pm
max the wonder dog wrote:Digetydog wrote:Although it is a point to argue, I doubt that it gets Memphis out of the contract.
1) It doesn't appear that the relationship was a secret; 2) If the AD was no longer represented by the agent, it is almost certainly not a problem; 3) I would bet $100 that UM had its own lawyer(s) and/or consultants that advised them on the contract; and 4) UM is a public university. Final say on contracts like Pastner's would almost certainly need to be approved by the "Board." Unless something very strange happened, (the AD lied to them or there were hidden terms in the contract) I think thier approval controls.
The stories on the contract issue have only reported that the university president at the time (now retired) signed the contract. There has been no mention of the state board overseeing the university approving it though, as I recall, their approval was needed to hire the new university president.
The school's lawyer did review it, but has since moved on to legal position for the state of TN. When a reporter asked her about it, she declined to comment citing "attorney-client privilege".
-
CA Mustang

-
- Posts: 2693
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 4:01 am
- Location: Elk Grove, CA
by Digetydog » Tue Mar 22, 2016 6:21 pm
max the wonder dog wrote:Digetydog wrote:Although it is a point to argue, I doubt that it gets Memphis out of the contract.
1) It doesn't appear that the relationship was a secret; 2) If the AD was no longer represented by the agent, it is almost certainly not a problem; 3) I would bet $100 that UM had its own lawyer(s) and/or consultants that advised them on the contract; and 4) UM is a public university. Final say on contracts like Pastner's would almost certainly need to be approved by the "Board." Unless something very strange happened, (the AD lied to them or there were hidden terms in the contract) I think thier approval controls.
The stories on the contract issue have only reported that the university president at the time (now retired) signed the contract. There has been no mention of the state board overseeing the university approving it though, as I recall, their approval was needed to hire the new university president.
If Memphis goes down this path in an attempt to get out of Pastner's deal, I really expect them to end up looking foolish. Bowen's version of events (who was involved in the deal on UM's side) seems consistent with what happens at other state schools. The idea that the AD could sign the deal on his own is ludicrous. Why? If the legally required sign offs are not obtained, the State can back out of the deal.
Do unto others before they do unto you!!
-

Digetydog

-
- Posts: 3913
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:33 am
by ponyinNC » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:50 am
regardless - this type of investigation (publicly) means the relationship between Pastner and UM is beyond repair...
-

ponyinNC

-
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:55 am
- Location: Wrightsville Beach, N.C.
by SMU Football Blog » Wed Mar 23, 2016 9:46 am
So the alleged conflict is that an agent/attorney representing Pastner either represents or previously represented the AD? That may or may not be a conflict for the agent (I don't think it is), but it is not a conflict for the AD absent some other factors.
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by smupony94 » Sun Mar 27, 2016 4:44 pm
Didn't think it was possible but Memphis is imploding further
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by max the wonder dog » Mon Mar 28, 2016 5:03 pm
smupony94 wrote:Didn't think it was possible but Memphis is imploding further
I assume 94 was referring to the news that rising senior Avery Woodson is transferring. Woodson, 9.6 pts and 1.4 assists in 26 minutes per game graduates and will be immediately eligible. But wait, there's more. Randall Brodie, per Scout the #7 shooting guard in his recruiting class, is transferring. He didn't play or practice last year, apparently due to academics. And Dedric Lawson, the team's leading scorer and rebounder, is testing the waters for the NBA draft. Two of the TIgers' assistant coaches have left for other jobs. Dedric and Keelon Lawson's dad, who came in a package deal, is the only assistant coach left. Charlie Moore, a 4 Star guard from Chicago, has committed but not signed and said he's sticking with his commitment "for now." The only other Tiger commitment for 2016 is an unranked forward from the Memphis JUCO. If Lawson leaves, they could be the worst team in the American next year.
-

max the wonder dog

-
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:24 am
- Location: Our Nation's Capital
by mtrout » Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:22 pm
Why is everyone leaving? I haven't paid close attention to the situation
-
mtrout

-
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:36 pm
by smupony94 » Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:29 pm
Hope TigerJ can read this thread
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Return to Basketball
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
|
|