by Stallion » Wed Feb 01, 2006 3:25 am
I believe the fairest way for a small class is to do a composite of both rankings which would place us about 85-87 or so. But Bennett says that he thought we would sign 20 or so-we know 3 players who are going to raise our total points a little and if we sign more to be make it 20 a little more. The same recruits will lower the stars average from 78 or where ever we are now. The more we sign the closer both scores will merge toward that 85-87 number. The stars average scores will change too as many of the players signed in recent days(see especially Rice, Tulane, Marshall and Memphis- aren't rated yet by Rivals-all of SMU's listed recruits are rated. As I've said I think all CUSA West teams tied for last-wouldn't put any particularly above the rest. And I don't think any CUSA West Teams did particularly well. Check out the discrepancy between the Total Points between East and West schools-no West school is even close to any East school and that ain't going to change. Remember one thing there are extra points you get from getting players who rank at their positions and other deviations so a straights Stars Average is not the same as the average between Total Points and No. of Recruits.