Official: SMU vs UCF Pedictions

[Stallion]

Then state that this is an alternate view in your original post instead of misrepresenting that these are the "Sagarin Ratings" which have 3 primary variations all of which have the AAC West as the 10th best Conference/Division.

[SMU_Alum11]

Well I think they’re still considered Sagarin ratings. It’s just his new methodology. From now on, I’ll say “Sagarin - New Methodology”...

[ALEX LIFESON]

Maybe when we get closer to game time, my heart prediction will surface...but, with our abysmal defense; I have a bad feeling for this one. UCF- a whole bunch SMU- not near enough.

[ender3]

Have to admit, I am very surprised how optimistic these predictions are.

UCF is averaging 49.6 points a game. We do NOT have an average defense. It's going to take more than 50 from the offense to win or a truly ridiculous number of turnovers generated by the D.

It has happened… but I don't see it this time around.

[03Mustang]

Well I think they’re still considered Sagarin ratings. It’s just his new methodology. From now on, I’ll say “Sagarin - New Methodology”...

So no fake news, but plenty of alternative facts.

[Charleston Pony]

Just remember Houston last year...who gave us a chance in that game?

[SMU21TCU10]

UCF by 20. We just don’t play well against better teams. I have no hope of upsetting anyone.

[crazy horse]

I think this game sets up like Houston last year, a possible coaching change, an improving SMU team.

I like our chances.
UCF 38
SMU 48

[AusTxPony]

Well, scoring 73 (FCS) and 63 (ECU) points against inadequate defenses will lift your average scoring a lot. We raised ours in the same manner. We need to hold them in the 30s to win, I would think. We'll see. Turnovers would appear to be our best chance.

[Pony Boss]

44-31 SMU

[StallionsModelT]

If we hold UCF under 30 then someone get the marble statue of Van Malone ready to put next to Doak.

[White Helmet]

53-13 UCF

[Bergermeister]

48-45 Southern Methodist

[One Trick Pony]

48-45 Southern Methodist

Can we score 48 points against UCLA

[SMU_Alum11]

Well I think they’re still considered Sagarin ratings. It’s just his new methodology. From now on, I’ll say “Sagarin - New Methodology”...

So no fake news, but plenty of alternative facts.

I can't argue against that!