PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Ruminations on our IPF

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby PerunaPunch » Mon Jan 15, 2018 3:01 pm

The point I was trying to make is that we have too few opportunities to compete on a level playing field with P5. This is one of those opportunities.

Also, overlooking men's track could prove to be shortsighted. If we ever want to move to a P5, you might want to have a facility where your men's track team could train. You might also want a facility that would appeal to potential multi-sport athletes like Margus.
"It's a couple hundred million dollars. I'm not losing sleep over it." -- David Miller
User avatar
PerunaPunch
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2681
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX, USA

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby smupony94 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 3:03 pm

PerunaPunch wrote:The point I was trying to make is that we have too few opportunities to compete on a level playing field with P5. This is one of those opportunities.

Also, overlooking men's track could prove to be shortsighted. If we ever want to move to a P5, you might want to have a facility where your men's track team could train. You might also want a facility that would appeal to potential multi-sport athletes like Margus.



Yeah, the original version was $160,000,000. Too many damn cheapskates on here for that kind of project
User avatar
smupony94
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 25665
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Bee Cave, Texas

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby mustangxc » Mon Jan 15, 2018 3:29 pm

As a track & field letterman I am glad that the multi-purpose facility is not being built. That facility involved razing the 400m outdoor track in favor of a 300m indoor track. In Texas it is much more important to have an outdoor track than an indoor track. Imagine training with A/C all year long and then having your athletes compete in the Texas heat in late May and June. That is really a non-starter. My vision for SMU Track & Field is to eventually build an indoor/outdoor complex on the other side of Central. While many P5 schools have 300m indoor tracks, I would rather have a world class facility like Arkansas has that is 200m banked track and the facility is exclusive to track. The facility being built will help eliminate the IPF as a reason/excuse for not recruiting better athletes in football and in Texas that is pretty much what it is about.
User avatar
mustangxc
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7338
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby mtrout » Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:50 pm

smupony94 wrote:
PerunaPunch wrote:The point I was trying to make is that we have too few opportunities to compete on a level playing field with P5. This is one of those opportunities.

Also, overlooking men's track could prove to be shortsighted. If we ever want to move to a P5, you might want to have a facility where your men's track team could train. You might also want a facility that would appeal to potential multi-sport athletes like Margus.



Yeah, the original version was $160,000,000. Too many damn cheapskates on here for that kind of project


Image
mtrout
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:36 pm

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby RGV Pony » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:32 pm

Yes it's convenient when you can count the cost of a whole new stadium in the #
User avatar
RGV Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 17269
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby mtrout » Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:06 pm

Well like it or not Houston is #leftlane #hammerdown and passing us by in the sports arms race like TCU did a decade ago.
mtrout
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:36 pm

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby Black Horseshoe » Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:26 pm

mtrout wrote:
smupony94 wrote:
PerunaPunch wrote:The point I was trying to make is that we have too few opportunities to compete on a level playing field with P5. This is one of those opportunities.

Also, overlooking men's track could prove to be shortsighted. If we ever want to move to a P5, you might want to have a facility where your men's track team could train. You might also want a facility that would appeal to potential multi-sport athletes like Margus.



Yeah, the original version was $160,000,000. Too many damn cheapskates on here for that kind of project


Image


They took on massive amounts of debt banking on the Big 12 invite that didn’t come
Black Horseshoe
Varsity
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby skyscraper » Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:21 pm

Dear lord some of you are fools.
I'm sorry the $30M IPF that has been incessantly demanded for almost a decade now isn't fancy enough for you.
What shoddy building has SMU constructed in the past two decades of campus growth? None.
You can't claim we need an IPF or we're going to fall behind and then get and say, well we need the one with the changing lights and the rims and the lifts.
A good thing is happening. Stop projecting your other issues with the AD or university onto a positive development.
Image
User avatar
skyscraper
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5471
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:46 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby gostangs » Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:27 pm

skyscraper wrote:Dear lord some of you are fools.
I'm sorry the $30M IPF that has been incessantly demanded for almost a decade now isn't fancy enough for you.
What shoddy building has SMU constructed in the past two decades of campus growth? None.
You can't claim we need an IPF or we're going to fall behind and then get and say, well we need the one with the changing lights and the rims and the lifts.
A good thing is happening. Stop projecting your other issues with the AD or university onto a positive development.


Ding ding ding......we have a winner!
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby PonyKai » Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:37 pm

mtrout wrote:Well like it or not Houston is #leftlane #hammerdown and passing us by in the sports arms race like TCU did a decade ago.


Right except for the part where they openly say they can’t afford to keep spending at current levels, nailed it.
PonyKai
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:04 am
Location: Here and there.

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby SMU89 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:40 pm

RGV Pony wrote:Anyone notice that the streets and parking spots in Lubbock are a lot bigger than they are in the Park Cities?
There are cars in Lubbock?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
User avatar
SMU89
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5216
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby NTXCoog » Mon Jan 15, 2018 10:43 pm

Black Horseshoe wrote:
They took on massive amounts of debt banking on the Big 12 invite that didn’t come


Part of the UH stadium and basketball arena used some debt and student fees for financing (naming rights paid for much of them) but everything other building was donated.

The IPF (which an AAS reporter said was better than UT's when UT practiced there for their bowl)
The Football Operations building
The Basketball Practice Facility
The Track upgrades
The Baseball stadium upgrades
The Baseball development facility
The tennis upgrades
NTXCoog
Varsity
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Aubrey TX USA

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby East Coast Mustang » Mon Jan 15, 2018 11:02 pm

PonyKai wrote:
mtrout wrote:Well like it or not Houston is #leftlane #hammerdown and passing us by in the sports arms race like TCU did a decade ago.


Right except for the part where they openly say they can’t afford to keep spending at current levels, nailed it.

Mtrout is one of the most ill-informed trolls on here (not a compliment)

And yes, Houston’s chancellor literally said they cant sustain this level of spending without a P5 invite.

“It's a practice that UH apparently realizes it cannot keep up. Chancellor Renu Khator wrote as much in an email obtained by the Houston Chronicle. If UH does not get into a major conference soon, "it will be difficult for us to sustain it," she wrote in 2014 to a UH professor who sent her an article about college athletics spending.”

http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/ho ... 125669.php
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
User avatar
East Coast Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7431
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby East Coast Mustang » Mon Jan 15, 2018 11:06 pm

skyscraper wrote:Dear lord some of you are fools.
I'm sorry the $30M IPF that has been incessantly demanded for almost a decade now isn't fancy enough for you.
What shoddy building has SMU constructed in the past two decades of campus growth? None.
You can't claim we need an IPF or we're going to fall behind and then get and say, well we need the one with the changing lights and the rims and the lifts.
A good thing is happening. Stop projecting your other issues with the AD or university onto a positive development.

This.

If anyone is seriously complaining about the quality of the IPF being planned- please step up and write your eight figure check ASAP while plans can still be modified.
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
User avatar
East Coast Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7431
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am

Re: Ruminations on our IPF

Postby Greenwich Pony » Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:50 am

The point is, why are we throwing more money down the toilet on it? If it's "as good as" then it is merely staving off the inevitable. It won't help us with a new conference and won't really show serious commitment to anyone. If "as good as" was good enough, I think concerned members of this board would be thrilled. However, yet again, we are years late, dollars short for us to have it do the good it needs to. All this demonstrates is that we as an administration or as a university cannot or will not compete at this level seriously and we're just throwing money away that could be spent improving the university where we can and should be competing. As good as tech, tcu , texas, baylor, then it loses it's recruiting pull because those schools play in bigger stadiums to larger crowds and at least on paper with a chance at a national title. This will be an expensive missed opportunity to compete in one of the few places where we can, facilities.

Aside from the IPF which, I agree, is not a huge deal though potentially a waste of $30 million (which is a pretty big deal), the way it has been done is illustrative of the bigger problems with the current leadership in all areas. Even the way it was done smells of a bait-and-switch from the B12 plan (which had a whiff of fraud about it to begin with) and when they did get approval, there was no fanfare or explanations and designs to get behind to encourage us to stroke checks.
Support the Commitment! We're all SMU Mustangs fans- we should all be committed!
Greenwich Pony
Varsity
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Westport, CT, USA

PreviousNext

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests