Deleted thread

by **McClown27** » Sat Feb 25, 2006 5:22 pm

PonyTales wrote: No, he didn't.

SMU turned in his violation. There is no dispute over this happening, but over the severity of the infraction. In the literal sense, he INVITED scrutiny.

I am no brain wizard, but if I was a D1 coach I would not take money from a player's family.

by PK » Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:23 pm

McClown27 wrote:
PonyTales wrote: No, he didn't.

SMU turned in his violation. There is no dispute over this happening, but over the severity of the infraction. In the literal sense, he INVITED scrutiny.

I am no brain wizard, but if I was a D1 coach I would not take money from a player's family.

Maybe I missed something, so tell me if I'm wrong here McClown27, but I believe they are investigating an allegation of a violation...not sure anyone has determined yet that a violation has actually occurred.

by **Stallion** » Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:30 pm

that's true-it has also been reported that the guy funneling the money is also the guy who reported the violation which makes it a lot more serious.

by **McClown27** » Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:59 pm

PK wrote:Maybe I missed something, so tell me if I'm wrong here McClown27, but I believe they are investigating an allegation of a violation...not sure anyone has determined yet that a violation has actually occurred.

Sorry, you are right. :oops:

I was under the impression that Copeland had already admitted some form of violation, and that we were arguing that it is not severe. Hope it is not.

Tubbs still invited this scrutiny.

Deleted thread

Who is online