Blunt Pony wrote:Hoop Fan wrote:man, did you take a double dose of the 'down on tubbs' pills this morning? wow, you'd think the guy is totally incapable and is in his 10th year of losing here. Dements second year wasnt worth a damn either. You thought this years schedule was weak, check out Dements early schedules I think they were worse. Plus I think Dement happened to have a few more veteran leaders to work with than Tubbs happens to have inherited. Its way too early to be down on the guy that much. This is smu, the roster he took over was in shambles and his recruiting, while not exciting yet, certainly appears to be better than Dements final two classes.
This pretty much sums up why we never improve. Why do we compare ourselves to ourselves. I don't recall anyone saying look back at the glory days of Dement! Dement's tenure was not good and this one is not starting out well. Let's compare ourselves and judge ourselves with other "successful" programs. Just because Dements record sucked his first two years, makes it o.k. for Tubbs' record to suck? I am not bashing Tubbs with this post, just don't try to make his record look o.k. by comparing him to previous unsuccessful SMU coaches.
I in no way think Dement is the benchmark. Before you rip me and tell me not to do something, you should probably realize that I am responding to people on the other side of the debate who raised Dement and how they were more 'excited' about the future in his second year. Never mind that it was fools gold and he ultimately failed. Dement got his fair chance, give Tubbs his.