Arkpony wrote:Was it the Tulsa game last year where Hicks wildly over threw a wide open receiver which would have won the game had he connected?
You'll have to be more specific
|
Tulsa isn't going to roll over.Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
25 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Tulsa isn't going to roll over.
You'll have to be more specific Leader of the Band-itos.
Mustangsabu wrote: Malonish! You are the man! PonyPride: I think malonish is right peruna81: God bless you, malonish. ![]()
Re: Tulsa isn't going to roll over.
For some reason I have to agree with your accessment. Can't quite put my finger on it, but I think you are right
Re: Tulsa isn't going to roll over.For one thing, we have a very consistent QB.
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and
doesn't care who wins. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
Re: Tulsa isn't going to roll over.
I have been practicing my assessment of the obvious. All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: Tulsa isn't going to roll over.
Which has not been the case. In. Forever.
Re: Tulsa isn't going to roll over.Since our other UT transfer.
Re: Tulsa isn't going to roll over.
Page was wide open for a TD and hicks threw it into a different zipcode. He also completely missed reggie in the endzone and was picked off. Those were some game changing plays. It was only close because of a field goal we blocked and returned for a TD.
Re: Tulsa isn't going to roll over.Easy to pile on Hicks well beyond Tulsa but that's a topic that deserves a thread of it's own. Who can forget the pick 6 at a critical time vs Michigan. Who knows how last season may have turned out if SMU won at Michigan?
Last edited by Charleston Pony on Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Tulsa isn't going to roll over.
Yeah. We had a great chance too! Shake It Off Moody
25 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests |
|