|
Jank apologists - you can admit you’re wrong in this threadModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
54 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: Jank apologists - you can admit you’re wrong in this thrBump
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
Re: Jank apologists - you can admit you’re wrong in this thrWe have been rather competitive this year in conference play outside of 1 game, a Cincy thrashing last month. This same Tulane team defeated Cincinnati at Tulane earlier this season, so you have to keep some perspective and not overact to any one game, whether good or bad.
My complaint with tankovich is that he took a 20-30th ranked team and moved them to 80-100. That alone should cost him his job, but I fully expect him to return next season. As it stands now, I will only get offended if they extend him.
Re: Jank apologists - you can admit you’re wrong in this thr
You hate Jankovich much more than you like SMU. Troll!
Re: Jank apologists - you can admit you’re wrong in this thrParty at The Wopper!
Re: Jank apologists - you can admit you’re wrong in this thrReal test for Jank and this staff on Saturday. I'm sure they will watch some film to see how Houston managed to beat Tulsa by 33 after losing to them in Tulsa. Crushing them on the boards and holding them to 35% shooting including 20% from three point range (and Tulsa's leading scorer Brandon Rachal to 0-9 shooting) is certainly a plus.
Re: Jank apologists - you can admit you’re wrong in this thr
Yes. We definitely need to maximize our five-on-five practice intensity this week and focus on the details necessary to beat Tulsa. Huge game now! Shake It Off Moody
Re: Jank apologists - you can admit you’re wrong in this thrYuck. Second Q3 loss of the year. Combined with the Cincy loss, the AAC might struggle to get a second bid to the NCAAs. Cincy has a lot of Q3 losses.
Re: Jank apologists - you can admit you’re wrong in this thrI might be wrong
![]() brick 3 shots ![]() Jank on the radio interview with Rich defended all the 3 shots ![]() it inside with the last team in the conference maybe you just aren't trying hard enough ![]() ![]() May the forth be with us.
Re: Jank apologists - you can admit you’re wrong in this thrI don't have any problem with this team shooting threes as long as they are "good threes". Those shots are created by getting the ball inside and by moving the ball and then finding the open guy after the defense has reacted to penetration and movement. All too often last night Tulane forced us to shoot from the left side and from a couple of feet beyond the 3 point line. This SMU team remains a pretty good 3 point shooting team (even after last night they've shot 34% on the season) and if they had hit just 25% last night they would have won that game.
54 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
|