Traitor.Charleston Pony wrote:Our guys are just getting man handled. Making Sonny's decision to bail on SMU look good
smu-tcu game thread
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 15134
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: University Park,TX US
Re: smu-tcu game thread
- soccermom
- PonyFans.com Legend
- Posts: 3362
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:48 am
- Location: League City, Tx
Re: smu-tcu game thread
Great, Maryland is hurt.
- soccermom
- PonyFans.com Legend
- Posts: 3362
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:48 am
- Location: League City, Tx
Re: smu-tcu game thread
Stone’s turn. Those stupid frogs.
Re: smu-tcu game thread
Maybe we should start investing more in academics!
Re: smu-tcu game thread
Rachee is so good!
- Mustangs_Maroons
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:03 am
- Location: New York, NY
Re: smu-tcu game thread
Hear! Hear! Could you imagine if we would have invested all this money on football and on the fountains and buildings on academics, maybe we’d be ranked higher than 72!CBpony wrote:Maybe we should start investing more in academics!
Here’s traitor dykes trying to run up the score at the half. Most coaches would take a knee here.
- SoCal_Pony
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 5901
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am
Re: smu-tcu game thread
We are still in this game…..
having said that, outside of Camar Wheaton, who was an unknown entering this season due to injury, i was rather underwhelmed with our RB group. Certainly not anywhere near P5 level, i suspect below average in AAC this year which is unacceptable if your goal is to win Championships.
I have not followed UCF, Cincy or UH that closely, but i bet their RBs are far superior to ours.
having said that, outside of Camar Wheaton, who was an unknown entering this season due to injury, i was rather underwhelmed with our RB group. Certainly not anywhere near P5 level, i suspect below average in AAC this year which is unacceptable if your goal is to win Championships.
I have not followed UCF, Cincy or UH that closely, but i bet their RBs are far superior to ours.
Re: smu-tcu game thread
SMU ball to start the second half. Score and this is a game again.
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 29068
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
Re: smu-tcu game thread
I saw his quote that he left because he had taken SMU as far as he could. I really want our guys to come back and win this game because right now it's looking like we have inferior talent and that is killing me. Have to win this game and start beating TCU for DFW area recruits. I just think this game is a LOT more important than those who are downplaying it suggest. TCU is never going to want to allow SMU into the same conference they are in because history suggests we will beat them IF we are on equal footing. As long as they are P5 and we remain G5 they are going to have an advantageponyboy wrote:Traitor.Charleston Pony wrote:Our guys are just getting man handled. Making Sonny's decision to bail on SMU look good
Re: smu-tcu game thread
Great score and defensive stand to close out the half. Need points to start the second half.DC-Pony wrote:SMU ball to start the second half. Score and this is a game again.
They can't cover 11. Gotta step up the run defense. Then again, Riley can thrash with the run and still call 75% pass plays.
Pay Lashlee more money
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 29068
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
Re: smu-tcu game thread
Agree. That 1st possession of 2nd half may well dictate the outcome of this gameDC-Pony wrote:SMU ball to start the second half. Score and this is a game again.
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 29068
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
Re: smu-tcu game thread
32 yards on 17 carries for our running game today. Our guys are just getting manhandled and if that doesn't change, our QBs are going to have to become a big part of the running game to keep TCU's defense honest. They keep sneaking 7-8 guys into the box to stuff the runSoCal_Pony wrote:We are still in this game…..
having said that, outside of Camar Wheaton, who was an unknown entering this season due to injury, i was rather underwhelmed with our RB group. Certainly not anywhere near P5 level, i suspect below average in AAC this year which is unacceptable if your goal is to win Championships.
I have not followed UCF, Cincy or UH that closely, but i bet their RBs are far superior to ours.
- mrydel
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 32038
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
Re: smu-tcu game thread
I think our RBs would be very good with P5 offensive linemenSoCal_Pony wrote:We are still in this game…..
having said that, outside of Camar Wheaton, who was an unknown entering this season due to injury, i was rather underwhelmed with our RB group. Certainly not anywhere near P5 level, i suspect below average in AAC this year which is unacceptable if your goal is to win Championships.
I have not followed UCF, Cincy or UH that closely, but i bet their RBs are far superior to ours.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: smu-tcu game thread
We’re not getting much in the run game. I wonder if we have outside pitches to RBs in our repertoire. Can’t totally abandon the run game in the second half. Will be great if we can find a way to get more production out of it.
- SoCal_Pony
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 5901
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am
Re: smu-tcu game thread
I understand the sentiment, but i completely disagree.mrydel wrote:I think our RBs would be very good with P5 offensive linemenSoCal_Pony wrote:We are still in this game…..
having said that, outside of Camar Wheaton, who was an unknown entering this season due to injury, i was rather underwhelmed with our RB group. Certainly not anywhere near P5 level, i suspect below average in AAC this year which is unacceptable if your goal is to win Championships.
I have not followed UCF, Cincy or UH that closely, but i bet their RBs are far superior to ours.
Of course we need improvement in the trenches, regardless, still think our RB group is inferior to upper-end AAC teams