|
SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College FootballModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
19 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College FootballInteresting data driven approach to rankings. More so than the media biased same ol same ol. Worth a look if you take the time to understand his approach.
https://www.sharpcollegefootball.com/ Link works best from PC.
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College FootballI’ll check it out, but it is kinda hard to believe we’d be ranked ahead of Maryland and TCU.
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College Football
I appreciate your candor @Ponyboy. He uses a different approach which essentially quantifies our potential(ceiling) vs the opponents potential. I think we'd all agree if we had played Maryland and TCU cleanly we would have won..... Also, how many AP/coaches poll teams remain ranked above teams they lost to without the benefit of a rigorous quantitative approach? i.e. Texas and OU...
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College FootballInteresting metrics. According to this analysis (which I do not pretend to understand but at first glance seems to be a mix of baseball and Wall St analytics), after 4 games, SMU is the best team in the AAC with Cincinnati being a close 2nd and Tulsa being a distant 3rd. Hmm.
It would be nice if it actually plays out this way.
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College Football
Indeed @ponywhupp0202. Note our Lamar game does not count in his data set as he excludes FCS school matchups for "cleaner" comparisons.
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College Footballhttps://www.sharpcollegefootball.com/
Sharp now has UCF at 7, TCU at 10, Maryland at16, SMU at 19, Navy at 51, and Cincinnati at 70.
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College Football
But can the Mustangs prove them right?
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College FootballWhat’s crazy about this is that if SMU really is #19, all of the other rankings of teams we’ve played make perfect sense.
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College FootballFirst of all, I would fully expect Bob Sharp to invent a model that would place us in the top 25.
Second, I provided him a bit of feedback. I like the model, however, special teams carries a bigger weight than it should. Realistically, our FG kicker is giving us a huge boost in the rankings, and the impact really shouldn't be nearly as large.
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College FootballThis is Bob Sharp’s model? Lol. I had no idea. No wonder Brisket Taco is ranked #24.
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College Football
If we used our field goal kicker with maximum effectiveness I might disagree. He is a hell of a kicker that should have been used many more times this season IMHO.
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College Football
Maybe you guys know something I do not? The host of this site goes by the name of Rob Bowron. Are we talking about the same person? Vanderbilt graduate?
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College Football
Exactly the right question to ask.
Re: SMU ranked 18th on Sharp College FootballThe most interesting stat at this point in the season is that our strength of schedule checks in at #4. Auburn, Vanderbilt and Texas Tech are the only teams with a stronger strength of schedule.
Auburn has played Mercer, San Jose State, Penn State, Missouri, LSU, Georgia, and Ole Miss.
19 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests |
|