Historic SMU Snubs
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
Historic SMU Snubs
1983 10-1 and 6th ranked SMU relegated to the Sun Bowl…1982 Cotton Bowl, beat pre season #1 Pitt, finish 10-0-1 and finish 2nd in the nation to a one loss Joe Peda Penn St squad…Eric has 100+ fewer carries V Hascal Waller who has only 125 more yards, ED had more TD’s and a 2 yard higher per carry stat, yet ED finishes 3rd in the Heisman behind Waller and Elpay. Others????? It’s always been this way, folks.
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
Elpay? “P” and “W” aren’t QWERTY-adjacent. Drink some water, please.GHammond wrote:1983 10-1 and 6th ranked SMU relegated to the Sun Bowl…1982 Cotton Bowl, beat pre season #1 Pitt, finish 10-0-1 and finish 2nd in the nation to a one loss Joe Peda Penn St squad…Eric has 100+ fewer carries V Hascal Waller who has only 125 more yards, ED had more TD’s and a 2 yard higher per carry stat, yet ED finishes 3rd in the Heisman behind Waller and Elpay. Others????? It’s always been this way, folks.
Oh, also I agree. The NCAA snub with LJ and team and band all sitting there. Also getting a 7-seed the year we won the AAC in Connecticut.
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
So letΓÇÖs respond differently because we havenΓÇÖt historically responded well. Blowout out BC.
- ponyte
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 11216
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
- Contact:
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
True snubs to be sure. This latest was expected.
First, the committee did all it could to ensure SMU didn't get ranked over Liberty. First, the committee didn't rank SMU even though the two other polls had us ranked. Second, the committee ranked us one spot behind Liberty and the other two polls had us ranked ahead of Liberty. But the true salt in the wounds was the manipulation of the final CFP ranking. The committee dropped multi week ranked Tulane form #17 to unranked. The other two polls still rank Tulane. The committee can now say, look, SMU didn't bet a final CFP ranked opponent.
Now, just to shore up the ACC, Cleamson is ranked ahead of Liberty and SMU in the final CFP poll. Clemson is unranked in the AP and coaches poll.
The NCAA takes an exorbitant glee in screwing SMU. Football, basketball it doesn't matter.
Sad but unfortunately its the world we live in.
First, the committee did all it could to ensure SMU didn't get ranked over Liberty. First, the committee didn't rank SMU even though the two other polls had us ranked. Second, the committee ranked us one spot behind Liberty and the other two polls had us ranked ahead of Liberty. But the true salt in the wounds was the manipulation of the final CFP ranking. The committee dropped multi week ranked Tulane form #17 to unranked. The other two polls still rank Tulane. The committee can now say, look, SMU didn't bet a final CFP ranked opponent.
Now, just to shore up the ACC, Cleamson is ranked ahead of Liberty and SMU in the final CFP poll. Clemson is unranked in the AP and coaches poll.
The NCAA takes an exorbitant glee in screwing SMU. Football, basketball it doesn't matter.
Sad but unfortunately its the world we live in.
- highlander
- All-American
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 12:10 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
But WHY? Why this multi-generational vendetta? What did we do to the NCAA that would make them want to put this forever-curse upon us? Don't say "pre-death-penalty cheating". The NCAA people involved in that are long gone.ponyte wrote:True snubs to be sure. This latest was expected.
First, the committee did all it could to ensure SMU didn't get ranked over Liberty. First, the committee didn't rank SMU even though the two other polls had us ranked. Second, the committee ranked us one spot behind Liberty and the other two polls had us ranked ahead of Liberty. But the true salt in the wounds was the manipulation of the final CFP ranking. The committee dropped multi week ranked Tulane form #17 to unranked. The other two polls still rank Tulane. The committee can now say, look, SMU didn't bet a final CFP ranked opponent.
Now, just to shore up the ACC, Cleamson is ranked ahead of Liberty and SMU in the final CFP poll. Clemson is unranked in the AP and coaches poll.
The NCAA takes an exorbitant glee in screwing SMU. Football, basketball it doesn't matter.
Sad but unfortunately its the world we live in.
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
Also screwed in soccer seedlings, volleyballl, basketball.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
- Mustangs_Maroons
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:03 am
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
Meanwhile the egregious transgressions of Perv State and Baylor are long forgotten. The cheating done my Michigan doesnΓÇÖt matter to the committee.
- Arkpony
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Little Rock, AR USA
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
And donΓÇÖt forget North Carolina walking away unscathed by the NCAA
Long live Inez Perez!
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
Are just talking about Football? Just asking for the 2013 MBB team.
- Arkpony
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Little Rock, AR USA
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
See previous posts. All sports.fan wrote:Are just talking about Football? Just asking for the 2013 MBB team.
Long live Inez Perez!
- Statler
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:49 pm
- Location: In the balcony -- stage left
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
Why it starts with the evil cow in Austin. No other private school in TX has our power to compete with them. Remember we beat them three times in six years and it drove them insane. If you can get your hands on ΓÇ£A Payroll to Meet,ΓÇ¥ It will enlighten you. Follow the money. Who benefits. I actually feel sorry for the farmers. They thought they had left the evil cow, but now they are in their shadow again.highlander wrote:But WHY? Why this multi-generational vendetta? What did we do to the NCAA that would make them want to put this forever-curse upon us? Don't say "pre-death-penalty cheating". The NCAA people involved in that are long gone.ponyte wrote:True snubs to be sure. This latest was expected.
First, the committee did all it could to ensure SMU didn't get ranked over Liberty. First, the committee didn't rank SMU even though the two other polls had us ranked. Second, the committee ranked us one spot behind Liberty and the other two polls had us ranked ahead of Liberty. But the true salt in the wounds was the manipulation of the final CFP ranking. The committee dropped multi week ranked Tulane form #17 to unranked. The other two polls still rank Tulane. The committee can now say, look, SMU didn't bet a final CFP ranked opponent.
Now, just to shore up the ACC, Cleamson is ranked ahead of Liberty and SMU in the final CFP poll. Clemson is unranked in the AP and coaches poll.
The NCAA takes an exorbitant glee in screwing SMU. Football, basketball it doesn't matter.
Sad but unfortunately its the world we live in.
- highlander
- All-American
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 12:10 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
So UT controls the NCAA and the CFP and still has it in for SMU after 40 years?Statler wrote: Why it starts with the evil cow in Austin. No other private school in TX has our power to compete with them. Remember we beat them three times in six years and it drove them insane. If you can get your hands on ΓÇ£A Payroll to Meet,ΓÇ¥ It will enlighten you. Follow the money. Who benefits. I actually feel sorry for the farmers. They thought they had left the evil cow, but now they are in their shadow again.
Honestly, I don't think UT ever thinks about SMU. I don't think UT can spell SMU.
- Statler
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:49 pm
- Location: In the balcony -- stage left
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
Follow the moneyhighlander wrote:So UT controls the NCAA and the CFP and still has it in for SMU after 40 years?Statler wrote: Why it starts with the evil cow in Austin. No other private school in TX has our power to compete with them. Remember we beat them three times in six years and it drove them insane. If you can get your hands on ΓÇ£A Payroll to Meet,ΓÇ¥ It will enlighten you. Follow the money. Who benefits. I actually feel sorry for the farmers. They thought they had left the evil cow, but now they are in their shadow again.
Honestly, I don't think UT ever thinks about SMU. I don't think UT can spell SMU.
- Mustangs_Maroons
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:03 am
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
UT is the epitome of whatΓÇÖs wrong with college football. They want to play by their own rules, entitled, cheat, threaten, manipulate, itΓÇÖs been their history.
- highlander
- All-American
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 12:10 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: Historic SMU Snubs
No doubt! But you'd think that, with all that power and money and everything else, they would be able to mix in a championship or two...Mustangs_Maroons wrote:UT is the epitome of whatΓÇÖs wrong with college football. They want to play by their own rules, entitled, cheat, threaten, manipulate, itΓÇÖs been their history.