Rumors of a Nationally Heralded Tranfer QB to Tech

by **SMU Football Blog** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:37 pm

While we are at it, where is the post that says eleven players from Tech's 34-man signing day class were not on the reporting roster, including two 4-star players?

From yesterday's DMN:

Eleven players from Tech's 34-man signing day class were not on the reporting roster and will either delay enrollment or enroll elsewhere. They are: Garland OL Buddy Brumit, Cordova, Tenn. RB Jocques Crawford, Iowa Park OL Tyler Duggins, Lufkin DB Leonard Hewitt, Baton Rouge, La. DE Jonathan Hollins, Celina TE Adam James, Houston S Daniel Johnson, Abilene WR Lyle Leong, Austin DT Broderick Marshall, San Diego, Calif., LB Trevor Reilly and Texas City DB Jarell Routt.

by **DiamondM** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:51 pm

Yes, blogmaster. As we all know, bias is as much about which facts you choose to report and which you do not as it is about how you report them. With Stallion, we all also know that we are going to hear all the good news for our "traditional and natural" rivals and none of the bad, and vice versa for SMU itself.

Oh, and any good press about SMU is always done by incompetent idiots with an agenda and should be given no weight. Good press about rivals and bad press about SMU, however, can be taken as absolute gospel.

by **me@smu** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:03 pm

Confirmation is up on TT's rival site that Derek has infact walked on to the TT program though will be ineligible for this season.

And thank you Blog for the updates on UNT and TT's incoming class...didn't know either case.

As for the good/bad...seems that there was just a thread on how TT lost their DE due to grades. DiamondM take the initiative if you are so passionate and start the threads about the negatives of our rivals.

by **Stallion** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:12 pm

I was the one who posted first the academic ineligibility of their star DE, then the academic ineligibility of another DE Rashad Hunt and then the fact that 1/3 of the Texas Tech recruiting class did not report and gave a detailed listing of such ineligible players. That's three "negative" posts on Tech yet factually accurate. Once again who is fair and balanced?

by **smu diamond m** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:17 pm

Stallion wrote:I was the one who posted first the academic ineligibility of their star DE, then the academic ineligibility of another DE Rashad Hunt and then the fact that 1/3 of the Texas Tech recruiting class did not report and gave a detailed listing of such ineligible players. That's three "negative" posts on Tech yet factually accurate. Once again who is fair and balanced?

Fox news?

by **DiamondM** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:35 pm

Stallion wrote:I was the one who posted first the academic ineligibility of their star DE, then the academic ineligibility of another DE Rashad Hunt and then the fact that 1/3 of the Texas Tech recruiting class did not report and gave a detailed listing of such ineligible players. That's three "negative" posts on Tech yet factually accurate. Once again who is fair and balanced?

My, aren't we sensitive? Can't take a little ribbing from this "sunshiner"? You're right, I should know better about throwing around concepts of always and never. Anyway, care to take a shot at mounting the evidence to prove you innocent of the other charge -- constantly (thought not necessarily always) crapping all over the reliability of any source reporting good news vis a vis SMU? How about this topic: Stallion used to gleefully point out how SMU had no one on any "Top X" list compared to its "traditional and natural rivals," and then when someone points out that SMU has as many DMN 100 as TCU, he says that those reporters are idiots and can't be trusted. Please discuss...

by **WorldStang** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:40 pm

Stallion wrote:I was the one who posted first the academic ineligibility of their star DE, then the academic ineligibility of another DE Rashad Hunt and then the fact that 1/3 of the Texas Tech recruiting class did not report and gave a detailed listing of such ineligible players. That's three "negative" posts on Tech yet factually accurate. Once again who is fair and balanced?

Let's all sing! No once Cares.. no one cares.. all together now.. no one cares!

I don't give a rats [deleted] about Tech.. who they're getting.. especially a transfer that couldn't even play next year!

Why don't you post something about him when he ACTUALLY DOES Transfer, Makes grades, and actually is playing against US!

I mean now we're posting rumors? How bored are you?

Good grief Stallion.. I mean my 12 year old kid is going to play at SMU someday too.. should I post something about him. He's looking great in practice.

by **jtstang** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:46 pm

DiamondM wrote:Anyway, care to take a shot at mounting the evidence to prove you innocent of the other charge -- constantly (thought not necessarily always) crapping all over the reliability of any source reporting good news vis a vis SMU?

Wow, prove yourself "innocent" of this "charge"?? That sounds like more than a "little ribbing" from a sunshiner. That sounds like the efforts of a sunshiner to impede on the realists' rights to practice realism, as guaranteed by the pony fan's constitution. You should be banned forever by the PCLU.

by **jtstang** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:47 pm

WorldStang wrote:I mean my 12 year old kid is going to play at SMU someday too.. should I post something about him. He's looking great in practice.

Got a "shuttle" time on him? What's he benching?

by **WorldStang** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:48 pm

lol

by **DiamondM** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:21 pm

jtstang wrote:
WorldStang wrote:I mean my 12 year old kid is going to play at SMU someday too.. should I post something about him. He's looking great in practice.

Got a "shuttle" time on him? What's he benching?

Doesn't matter because it would be unverified by Rivals.

by **me@smu** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:25 pm

It isn't a rumor...he has transferred officially and since he was practicing, he must have been admitted alright (since I don't believe you can actually enter fall practice without being officially admitted into school.)

But the most interesting point of this all is that Shaw makes five blue-chip QBs on their roster at the start of next year (provided their Stefan Loucks holds his commitment). Have to believe that 1 or more will be looking for a new home shortly.

by **jtstang** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:37 pm

DiamondM wrote:
jtstang wrote:
WorldStang wrote:I mean my 12 year old kid is going to play at SMU someday too.. should I post something about him. He's looking great in practice.

Got a "shuttle" time on him? What's he benching?

Doesn't matter because it would be unverified by Rivals.

That's it. You've turned your hate-mongering ways on me, you anti-realite!! I will have the PCLU down on your head so fast it would make your head spin if they weren't down on it.

by **DiamondM** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:55 pm

Tell your PCLU panty-waist friends to bring it on.

Note: Message paid for and approved by ARISE (Association for the Radical Indoctrination of Sunshiner Ethics).

by **jtstang** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:01 pm

You are a RABID ANTI-REALITE!!!!

This hate cannot be tolerated. I nominate Diamond M as the banned-poster-girl for banning posters.

Rumors of a Nationally Heralded Tranfer QB to Tech

Who is online