|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by smu diamond m » Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:51 pm
RedAttack wrote:While its generous for you to give us 10 points for home field, I think its a little lofty to think we're only 4 points better than you at a neutral locale.
I think it's a bit lofty for you to think we're only 4 pt underdogs at a neutral locale.
Sir, shooting-star, sir. Frosh 2005 (TEN YEARS AGO!?!) The original Heavy Metal.
-

smu diamond m

-
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: High on the Hilltop
-
by RedAttack » Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:53 pm
You obviously have no say in the Vegas odds, do you. And that's a good thing, because judging by that statement, you'd be broke.
-
RedAttack

-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:59 am
by smu diamond m » Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:59 pm
RedAttack wrote:You obviously have no say in the Vegas odds, do you. And that's a good thing, because judging by that statement, you'd be broke.
OMGOSH I FORGOT ABOUT THE REDATTACK BOOKIE AGENCY SORRY I EVER DOUBTED YOU SIR DON'T HURT ME
Sir, shooting-star, sir. Frosh 2005 (TEN YEARS AGO!?!) The original Heavy Metal.
-

smu diamond m

-
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: High on the Hilltop
-
by mrydel » Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:49 pm
DanFreibergerForHeisman wrote:Oh how this pains me, but Tech 74, SMU 8.
And what if SMU went back to the white helmets?
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by davidsmu94 » Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:39 am
RedAttack wrote:While its generous for you to give us 10 points for home field, I think its a little lofty to think we're only 4 points better than you at a neutral locale.
Tech, like most offences will be better later in the year than the first game
-
davidsmu94

-
- Posts: 1660
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:03 pm
by RedRaiderfan85 » Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 pm
Oh how this pains me, but Tech 74, SMU 8.
ouch
-
RedRaiderfan85

-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 2:32 pm
by Techsan-81 » Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:04 am
Texas Tech 41
SMU 10
I think Graham Harrell will light it up, but penalties will keep us under 50 pts.
-
Techsan-81
-
by MustangStealth » Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:20 am
mrydel wrote:And what if SMU went back to the white helmets?
Tech 21
SMU 17
white helmets and blue jerseys:
Tech 14
SMU 24
-

MustangStealth

-
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible
by MustangStealth » Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:24 am
Col. Nathan R. Jessep wrote:Rain-soaked FB slows down the RR offense.
With comfortable 2nd half 21-6 lead, the unrestrained ego of Leach cannot go easy. Bombs away play calling by Leach gives us a couple of INT & we steal it in the final minute 23-20.
Despite the road upset, PB stills offer to whip Leach's [deleted] @ 50 yd line. There are no takers.
I see Tech ran the old "lose a point play" in the second half. 
-

MustangStealth

-
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible
by BrianTinBigD » Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:33 pm
Here is my overall game prediction:
Final Score - SMU 21 - Tech 23
SMU Highlights
Defense
A. Haywood 2 Sacks and 1 Fumble Recovery
J. Sturdivant 2 Picks and 12 tackles
J. Rogers - 1 sack and 1 Fumble Caused
Offense
D. Martin - 123 yards rushing, 25 yards receiving and 2 TD
B. Chase - 5 Catches for 83 yards and 1 TD
R. Kennedy - 2 Catches for 45 yards
J. Willis - 10-15 passing for 153 yards, 63 rushing yards and 1 TD
Special teams
J. Henderson - 6 returns for 180 yards - At least one for 40+ yards.
I really think that this game will be closer than anyone realizes. With the new clock rules, Tech does not get as many touches, our defense won't get as tired, and the game time temp will keep them fresh. With a game time temp of 70 and the possibility of a wet field look for SMU to keep this close.
I expect D-Line pressure on Tech all night long and Graham Harrell is going to find out what Palmer and Kolb found out about the SMU pass rush at the end of last year. Expect short passes to Martin and Kennedy to set up strikes to Bobby Chase who is always good for at least 75 yards and a TD against a Big 12 opponent. Still don't think we have enough in the tank and it might take a late 4th qtr surge to beat us but I do not expect a blow out like others have predicted.
Class of '91
-

BrianTinBigD

-
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 11:39 am
- Location: Allen, Texas
by BUS » Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:25 pm
SMU - 28
TT - 24
Mustang Militia: Fight the good fight"
-

BUS

-
- Posts: 7283
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Richardson, Tx usa
by Pony_Fan » Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:49 pm
Tech 38
SMU 10
I'll eat crow, but we'll get our asses handed to us. I am hoping it's close
to this score and not the complete embarassing blowout.
-

Pony_Fan

-
- Posts: 6130
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Tx, USA
by A-town Pony » Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:57 pm
First, can I just say that I don't care for Lubbock? There are some crazy women out there. I predict SMU will be able to run the ball with some success and keep the score lower plus we get 2 interceptions.
Is Hicks playing to TTU? I heard he was an academic casualty for the first game.
Tech 24
SMU 17
-
A-town Pony

-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 8:26 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
by SMU Football Blog » Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:28 pm
Pony_Fan wrote:Tech 38 SMU 10
I'll eat crow, but we'll get our asses handed to us. I am hoping it's close to this score and not the complete embarassing blowout.
I agree.
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 17 guests
|
|