i thik its say someone was held accountable... and the team suffered from itLakeHighlandsPony wrote:WHY is the team having a function at 2:40 am the night before the team leaves for El Paso?????????????
Someone needs to held accountable!
|
"2:41 a.m: Off Campus Aggravated Assault"Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
45 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
The suspension was for fighting-I am talking about the team partying at 2:40 am.
Maybe the coaches do not have control of this team?
Re: J-Will
Homedude, calm down. A sufficient response would've been "I was there, much like the rest of the team." or "I was there." or, God forbid, "I was kicking the [deleted] out of him too!" Sir, shooting-star, sir.
Frosh 2005 (TEN YEARS AGO!?!) The original Heavy Metal.
Re: J-Will
I think it takes most people a few months to start catching the sarcasm and satire on this board.
061118 2:41 AM: Off Campus Aggravated Assault: 6002 Sandhurst, Dallas. A student report that he was assaulted by two students. Open.
I'm really concerned about the use of the word "aggravated" in the police log. I looked up "aggravated assault" in a legal dictionary and usually that's reserved for the use of a dangerous weapon or intent of cause serious bodily injury. Now the article on the Daily Campus's website said the stalker character was not serious injured. I would hope that Justin would not attack someone with a dangerous weapon. Maybe I'm just being overly paranoid in my hopes that Justin will be back for the Marshall game. Anyone else have thoughts?
The ponyfans legal team (harhar) will know better than me, but I imagine a trained athlete beating an effeminate gentile might be considered aggravated. Or the SMU PD wanted to clear up that the assailants were aggravated. Sir, shooting-star, sir.
Frosh 2005 (TEN YEARS AGO!?!) The original Heavy Metal.
they only use aggrevated to classify what type of assault it was.
if it was with any type of weapon they would have said "assault with a deadly weapon"
I hope that's all is meant, otherwise this will be a long ordeal for Justin. (I must admit that I would be pretty aggravated if "an effeminate gentile" kept following me, especially as out of the way as a football player gathering.)
I hope you're right.
Wrong, assault with a weapon is an aggravated assault. From the Texas Penal Code: § 22.02. AGGRAVATED ASSAULT. (a) A person commits an offense if the person commits assault as defined in § 22.01 and the person: (1) causes serious bodily injury to another, including the person's spouse; or (2) uses or exhibits a deadly weapon during the commission of the assault. (b) An offense under this section is a felony of the second degree, except that the offense is a felony of the first degree if: (1) the actor uses a deadly weapon during the commission of the assault and causes serious bodily injury to a person whose relationship to or association with the defendant is described by Section 71.0021(b), 71.003, or 71.005, Family Code; or (2) regardless of whether the offense is committed under Subsection (a)(1) or (a)(2), the offense is committed: (A) by a public servant acting under color of the servant's office or employment; (B) against a person the actor knows is a public servant while the public servant is lawfully discharging an official duty, or in retaliation or on account of an exercise of official power or performance of an official duty as a public servant; (C) in retaliation against or on account of the service of another as a witness, prospective witness, informant, or person who has reported the occurrence of a crime; or (D) against a person the actor knows is a security officer while the officer is performing a duty as a security officer. (c) The actor is presumed to have known the person assaulted was a public servant or a security officer if the person was wearing a distinctive uniform or badge indicating the person's employment as a public servant or status as a security officer. (d) In this section, "security officer" means a commissioned security officer as defined by Section 1702.002, Occupations Code, or a noncommissioned security officer registered under Section 1702.221, Occupations Code.
And that's what bothers me. That's an important detail that no one has included.
Well maybe that just means SMU is finally making it back to big time. C'mon, ponyfans attorneys could plea it down to a misdemeanor, right? Then again, no arrest has been made. And correct me if I'm wrong, but if the alleged victim was trespassing after having been asked to leave, in Texas that is now considered an attempted burglary of a habitation or some such, and could be a felony. Of all the attorneys we have on the board, are any of you criminal attorneys? (Yes I am leaving some room for smarta$$ retorts to that question).
45 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: ponyte and 2 guests |
|