NCAA BRACKETS RELEASED

jkflamebo · Post by **jkflamebo** » Mon Nov 06, 2006 4:21 pm

Men as a 3 seed are set up to go against the winner of UC Santa Barbara/San Diego St. and the women are set to go against Mcneese St., if they win we go against A&M yet again this year in the tourney

mustangbill67 · Post by **mustangbill67** » Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:32 pm

This is the link. UAB only other C-USA team to get in. Again, no respect. This is a championship the Mustangs need to win both for SMU as well as the conference.

http://ncaasports.com/soccer/mens/story/9782830

Post by **PonyPride** » Mon Nov 06, 2006 8:39 pm

The men's team got jobbed here.

We're No. 2 in the country. We won the conference tournament. The No. 1 team lost in its conference tournament. And SMU ends up as the No. 3 seed?

Make 'em pay, Ponies!

mustangbill67 · Post by **mustangbill67** » Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:51 pm

Looks like our first game will be at home on Wednesday, November 15. We need a big turnout.

Pony_Fan · Post by **Pony_Fan** » Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:56 pm

Does anything happen on campus to promote these games?

saprissa13 · Post by **saprissa13** » Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:27 pm

Pony_Fan wrote:Does anything happen on campus to promote these games?

Not really. Maybe a few random posters in the dorms that get torn down pretty quick.

Big10Ponyfan · Post by **Big10Ponyfan** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:26 am

PonyPride wrote:The men's team got jobbed here.

We're No. 2 in the country. We won the conference tournament. The No. 1 team lost in its conference tournament. And SMU ends up as the No. 3 seed?

Make 'em pay, Ponies!

Just look at it like we one of the top 4 No. 1 seeds in the tournament. My gosh, we get Wescott all the way to St. Louis so you can't argue with that. Now, we have to take care of business to get there. There is probably more pressure on this team than any other Shellas has coached.

By the way, should our women just book tickets to College Station every year. This is such a beating. But now, let's beat the Gaggies.

Best wishes to both.

Pony_Fan · Post by **Pony_Fan** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:48 am

saprissa13 wrote:
Pony_Fan wrote:Does anything happen on campus to promote these games?

Not really. Maybe a few random posters in the dorms that get torn down pretty quick.

That is too bad

ponyup10 · Post by **ponyup10** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 12:31 pm

People will come, there was a big turnout for the South Carolina game and it was freezing...

And word of mouth goes a long way on a college campus...it can just be people sitting eating or in class or walking and if they're talking about it, people will over hear

Pony_Fan · Post by **Pony_Fan** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:51 pm

Orsini should place a fake student on campus that is marketing and talks about sports all the time

Terry Webster · Post by **Terry Webster** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:58 pm

The team that should be angry about getting screwed is UK. It is hard to believe that the ncaa found 26 teams better than UK to selct.

jkflamebo · Post by **jkflamebo** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:13 pm

both kentucky and south carolina were worthy of bids. i think they'd wallop gardner-webb and/or western illinois each. i thought south carolina would definitely get a bid, they looked very very impressive

saprissa13 · Post by **saprissa13** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:57 pm

Pony_Fan wrote:Orsini should place a fake student on campus that is marketing and talks about sports all the time

I think i'm becoming that...

me@smu · Post by **me@smu** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:32 pm

UK and USC are definitely the two teams that got screwed. Even though we didn't end up with our rightful #1 seed, we still get homefield throughout and hopefully can turn it into something special

Post by **SmooPower** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:43 pm

jkflamebo wrote:both kentucky and south carolina were worthy of bids. i think they'd wallop gardner-webb and/or western illinois each. i thought south carolina would definitely get a bid, they looked very very impressive

I guess SOS caught up with them at the end.