SI Power Rankings...

by **J.T.supporta** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:02 pm

not that it matters since the season is over with but Mandel ranks us at 69...

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/f ... index.html

by **Stallion** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:11 pm

Sagarin ranks us at 89 which is much more realistic

by **expony18** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:12 pm

J.T.supporta wrote:not that it matters since the season is over with but Mandel ranks us at 69...

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/f ... index.html

but #1 in our hearts

by **expony18** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:13 pm

Stallion wrote:Sagarin ranks us at 89 which is much more realistic

oh man get over it

by **Stallion** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:30 pm

that is a extremely accurate statement of SMU's present football strength. We are better than about 30 Division 1A programs-lucky Phil knows who they are.

by **expony18** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:34 pm

Stallion wrote:that is a extremely accurate statement of SMU's present football strength. We are better than about 30 Division 1A programs-lucky Phil knows who they are.

im just thankful we have you to always bring us back to reality...

by **Stallion** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:36 pm

Thanks I'll be checking in every once in awhile to keep you updated on reality.

by **expony18** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:38 pm

well reality for me will be torts and contracts until dec12 at 8pm... so if you want to help me review that would be great.. Seacrest out!

by **JesuitPony** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:29 pm

expony18 wrote:well reality for me will be torts and contracts until dec12 at 8pm... so if you want to help me review that would be great.. Seacrest out!

Is a promise not to drink, smoke, swear or gamble adequate consideration, Mr. Expony18?

SI Power Rankings...

SI Power Rankings...

Re: SI Power Rankings...

Who is online