|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by smucubs » Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:05 am
Football is dead at SMU. We gave it a good shot and came up a yard short. Texas is a hotbed for baseball talent. Lets use that money to building a new stadium on campus, bring in a good coach, and in two years we would be playing for the national championship. Baseball has been long overdue in its return the to the SMU campus.
-
smucubs

-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:47 am
by EastStang » Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:52 am
You put up the $40 Million or so that it will take to field a competitive football and softball program as well as some other minor women's sport like gymnastics or bowling and they'll be happy to listen to you.
-
EastStang

-
- Posts: 12668
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am
by PonyPride » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:02 am
smucubs wrote:Football is dead at SMU. We gave it a good shot and came up a yard short. Texas is a hotbed for baseball talent. Lets use that money to building a new stadium on campus, bring in a good coach, and in two years we would be playing for the national championship. Baseball has been long overdue in its return the to the SMU campus.
A) Football is not dead at SMU
B) There's a $56 million stadium with the chairman of the board of trustees' name over the door. Football is going nowhere.
C) Have you noticed there are some football players in Texas, too? Apparently in most towns in the state, the Super Bowl is played every Friday night. Roger Clemens and Josh Beckett aside, Texas always is and always will be a football state first.
D) The baseball issue has been beaten to death. Over and over and over. It's a non-issue.
-

PonyPride

-
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas
-
by 2112 » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:04 am
60 MILLION DOLLAR STADIUM.
-
2112

-
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 10:32 am
by davidsmu94 » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:33 am
smucubs wrote:Football is dead at SMU. We gave it a good shot and came up a yard short. Texas is a hotbed for baseball talent. Lets use that money to building a new stadium on campus, bring in a good coach, and in two years we would be playing for the national championship. Baseball has been long overdue in its return the to the SMU campus.
Screw Baseball, we have a track, lets use it.
-
davidsmu94

-
- Posts: 1660
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:03 pm
by NavyCrimson » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:33 am
Believe me, I'd love BASEBALL, too. But unfortunately, it's simply not realistic in the 'near' future; down the road, you never know
Who would ever thought college BASEBALL would have gotten as big as it is now? Frankly - no one!
BRING BACK THE GLORY DAYS OF SMU FOOTBALL!!!
For some strange reason, one of the few universities that REFUSE to use their school colors: Harvard Crimson & Yale Blue.
-

NavyCrimson

-
- Posts: 3163
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Simi Valley-CA (Hm of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library)
by mrydel » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:36 am
To get either Baseball or Track back you are going to have to start with Women's Softball or Women's Track and then start the discussion for the men.
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by Thumper » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:38 am
davidsmu94 wrote:Screw Baseball, we have a track, lets use it.
Absolutely right!
We do have a women's track team now, right?
-

Thumper

-
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Tyler, Texas
by davidsmu94 » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:39 am
mrydel wrote:To get either Baseball or Track back you are going to have to start with Women's Softball or Women's Track and then start the discussion for the men.
We already have a women's track team
-
davidsmu94

-
- Posts: 1660
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:03 pm
by mrydel » Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:33 am
Then I would assume we need women's tiddly winks in order to satisfy the Title IX requirements.
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by jtstang » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:14 pm
mrydel wrote:Then I would assume we need women's tiddly winks in order to satisfy the Title IX requirements.
If we got the women to show there tiddlies more often, the winks would surely follow.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by perunapower » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:19 pm
jtstang wrote:mrydel wrote:Then I would assume we need women's tiddly winks in order to satisfy the Title IX requirements.
If we got the women to show there tiddlies more often, the winks would surely follow.
Oh no... that was absolutely awful.
-

perunapower

-
- Posts: 2501
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:39 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by docabel » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:23 pm
perunapower wrote:jtstang wrote:mrydel wrote:Then I would assume we need women's tiddly winks in order to satisfy the Title IX requirements.
If we got the women to show there tiddlies more often, the winks would surely follow.
Oh no... that was absolutely awful.
Oh yes... that was absolutely brilliant.
-
docabel

-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:48 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by smupony94 » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:54 pm
jtstang wrote:mrydel wrote:Then I would assume we need women's tiddly winks in order to satisfy the Title IX requirements.
If we got the women to show there tiddlies more often, the winks would surely follow.
I thought the mention of women's track got a thread deleted, oh I forgot women's golf
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
|
|