SI rankings of WAC and our opponents

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Post Reply
User avatar
SoCal_Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am

SI rankings of WAC and our opponents

Post by SoCal_Pony »

WAC
Fresno St #29, Hawaii #50, Boise St #61, San Jose St #90, Nevada #96, LA Tech #100, Rice #102, Tulsa #106, SMU #107, UTEP #110

Non-Conference
OSU #25, TCU #28, TTech #74, Baylor #85

While I am surprised at TTech’s low ranking, I think they will be very difficult to beat in Lubbock.

My bold prediction: This is the last year SMU starts the season in triple digits for a very long time.
PonyTales
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1286
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Garland, Texas

Re: SI rankings of WAC and our opponents

Post by PonyTales »

Great prediction - and I think you're right.

Can't believe Boise's ranked that low. They're really tough.
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 29169
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Re: SI rankings of WAC and our opponents

Post by Charleston Pony »

that lack of respect for SMU is going to help us one of these years, when we become the surprise team of the year.

These pre-season predictions can come pretty close to picking the top 10-15 teams, but after that there is a fine line between good and bad seasons.

If we can find some offense this year, I'd like to think we can at least compete with everyone on our schedule. Keep in mind that four of our five toughest opponents come to Ford this year. If we can get more than 10,000 people out to support these guys, they just might find it inside of them to overachieve THIS YEAR.
User avatar
KnuckleStang
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2605
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Lynchburg, VA, USA

Re: SI rankings of WAC and our opponents

Post by KnuckleStang »

Is it just me, or do Texas Tech and Hawaii look a little low as well?

So Cal noticed the TT thing, sorry, didn't see that at first.

[This message has been edited by KnuckleStang (edited 08-11-2003).]
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7250
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Re: SI rankings of WAC and our opponents

Post by JasonB »

Baylor is ranked too high.

Tech, Hawaii, us, and SJS are not rated high enough.

Boise lost a lot of players, they will not be as good this year. 61 is a bit of a slight though.
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5529
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: SI rankings of WAC and our opponents

Post by Water Pony »

I'll say it again, several teams "exceed" expectations every year. Who will beat these predictions? I say SMU in 2003 will surprise.

Who else?
Pony Up
User avatar
Sam I Am
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2013
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Jacksonville, Texas

Re: SI rankings of WAC and our opponents

Post by Sam I Am »

Bennett has been able to develop a rushing game for SMU. In college football that is usually a sign of strong, winning team. Although I am not expecting a great leap forward, the team is developing the righit fundamentals to win big eventually. I think we are grossly under rated based on what we see developing, but based on our past records the triple digits are fair before the season begins.
Sam I Am
WreckEm16
Junior Varsity
Junior Varsity
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 3:01 am

Re: SI rankings of WAC and our opponents

Post by WreckEm16 »

Sagarin has Tech at #28. That seems much more realistic to me.
And when I die<BR>You can bury me<BR>In Lubbock, Texas,<BR>In my jeans.<P>-Mac Davis
Post Reply