|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by PonyKai » Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:23 pm
As a long time reader, first time poster, I guess my first would have to be a nagging question that goes all the way back to last September. NTSU seems to view games with us as a rivalry despite the somewhat one sided record, and I keep reading and hearing that we "stiffed" them and kept them out of joining a better conference.
So my question is, what did SMU "do" to upset all those JUCOers in Denton?
-
PonyKai

-
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Here and there.
by smu diamond m » Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:48 pm
Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:As a long time reader, first time poster, I guess my first would have to be a nagging question that goes all the way back to last September. NTSU seems to view games with us as a rivalry despite the somewhat one sided record, and I keep reading and hearing that we "stiffed" them and kept them out of joining a better conference.
So my question is, what did SMU "do" to upset all those JUCOers in Denton?
They claim that President Turner did everything in his power (successfully, I might add) to prevent them from joining CUSA, whilst us taking thier spot.
Sir, shooting-star, sir. Frosh 2005 (TEN YEARS AGO!?!) The original Heavy Metal.
-

smu diamond m

-
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: High on the Hilltop
-
by Water Pony » Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:04 pm
Much To Do About Nothing!
It was never a real possibility and we didn't need to make a case either way. Tulsa, Rice and UTEP were better options for CUSA, along with us.
Pony Up
-

Water Pony

-
- Posts: 5525
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Chicagoland
by expony18 » Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:51 pm
Water Pony wrote:Much To Do About Nothing!
It was never a real possibility and we didn't need to make a case either way. Tulsa, Rice and UTEP were better options for CUSA, along with us.
tulsa, rice, smu= private utep, ntsu=public.... tulsa,rice, utep, ntsu =have each gone to a bowl game in the last 20, smu=has not gone to a bowl game in 20 years
WEST DIVISION CHAMPS 2010
-
expony18

-
- Posts: 9968
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:54 pm
by CalallenStang » Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:03 pm
expony18 wrote:Water Pony wrote:Much To Do About Nothing!
It was never a real possibility and we didn't need to make a case either way. Tulsa, Rice and UTEP were better options for CUSA, along with us.
tulsa, rice, smu= private utep, ntsu=public.... tulsa,rice, utep, ntsu =have each gone to a bowl game in the last 20, smu=has not gone to a bowl game in 20 years
Your statement about Rice's bowl history was not true at the time of the Conference realignment...hadn't they last appeared sometimes in the 60s?
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
by perunapower » Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:09 pm
expony18 wrote:Water Pony wrote:Much To Do About Nothing!
It was never a real possibility and we didn't need to make a case either way. Tulsa, Rice and UTEP were better options for CUSA, along with us.
tulsa, rice, smu= private utep, ntsu=public.... tulsa,rice, utep, ntsu =have each gone to a bowl game in the last 20, smu=has not gone to a bowl game in 20 years
Tulsa, Rice, UTEP, and NTSU didn't receive the death penalty and subsequently shoot their own feet off in the worst athletic department decision making in the history of collegiate athletics. That is the reason why we haven't been to a bowl game in 23 years.
-

perunapower

-
- Posts: 2501
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:39 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by expony18 » Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:25 pm
CalallenStang wrote:expony18 wrote:Water Pony wrote:Much To Do About Nothing!
It was never a real possibility and we didn't need to make a case either way. Tulsa, Rice and UTEP were better options for CUSA, along with us.
tulsa, rice, smu= private utep, ntsu=public.... tulsa,rice, utep, ntsu =have each gone to a bowl game in the last 20, smu=has not gone to a bowl game in 20 years
Your statement about Rice's bowl history was not true at the time of the Conference realignment...hadn't they last appeared sometimes in the 60s?
you guys are soo sensitive, NC in baseball though...
WEST DIVISION CHAMPS 2010
-
expony18

-
- Posts: 9968
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:54 pm
by expony18 » Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:26 pm
perunapower wrote:expony18 wrote:Water Pony wrote:Much To Do About Nothing!
It was never a real possibility and we didn't need to make a case either way. Tulsa, Rice and UTEP were better options for CUSA, along with us.
tulsa, rice, smu= private utep, ntsu=public.... tulsa,rice, utep, ntsu =have each gone to a bowl game in the last 20, smu=has not gone to a bowl game in 20 years
Tulsa, Rice, UTEP, and NTSU didn't receive the death penalty and subsequently shoot their own feet off in the worst athletic department decision making in the history of collegiate athletics. That is the reason why we haven't been to a bowl game in 23 years.
we all know we got the death penalty and the results... doesnt mean we should be in the big xii
WEST DIVISION CHAMPS 2010
-
expony18

-
- Posts: 9968
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:54 pm
by mr. pony » Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:37 pm
I think we should be. We d@mn sure deserve to be as much as Baylor.
-
mr. pony

-
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm
by jtstang » Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:03 pm
Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:So my question is, what did SMU "do" to upset all those JUCOers in Denton?
Those paranoid delusionaries think that SMU blackballed them from the SWC, the WAC and C-USA. The flaw in their argument, which none will acknowledge, is that they could not make it on their own merits. Actually, that may be the only truth in their argument, come to think of it.
And really, how does somebody who is not yet in a conference blackball another team that is also not in the conference? Makes no sense.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by PonyFan » Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:03 pm
Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:.... So my question is, what did SMU "do" to upset all those JUCOers in Denton?
We got into college! 
"What kind of weirdo school are they running over there in Fort Worth?"
- Randy Galloway
ESPN Radio (103.3 FM)
-

PonyFan

-
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas
-
by PhirePhilBennett » Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:15 pm
NTSU for SMU is like:
the Texas Tech to Texas A&M (UT)
the Texas A&M to Texas (OU)
the Cincinatti to Ohio State (Michigan),
etc.
We gain NOTHING by beating them, and amass total embarassment for losing to them.
-
PhirePhilBennett
-
by expony18 » Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:16 pm
PhirePhilBennett wrote:We gain NOTHING by beating them.
except we would have gone to a bowl game... smu can not over look anybody, not even ASU
WEST DIVISION CHAMPS 2010
-
expony18

-
- Posts: 9968
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:54 pm
by PhirePhilBennett » Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:22 pm
expony18 wrote:PhirePhilBennett wrote:We gain NOTHING by beating them.
except we would have gone to a bowl game... smu can not over look anybody, not even ASU
Actually, the question was, and still is, DID WE GAIN ANYTHING BY PLAYING THEM?
The answer is "NO!"
-
PhirePhilBennett
-
by PonyKai » Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:28 pm
Well I knew already that we gain absolutely nothing from them, except embarassment for losing. Just wondering what they thought we did to "wrong" them. But last years road trip to Denton was the worst. I mean to have to actually walk around that place and look at the buildings and their students? That's cruel and unusal punishment.
-
PonyKai

-
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Here and there.
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests
|
|