NCAA punishes OU

by **George S. Patton** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:18 pm

Funny, how they moved quicker on their football case than our basketball case.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent ... 8ab5b.html

by **LonghornFan68** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:24 pm

This is Oklahoma's sixth major NCAA infractions case involving football and seventh overall. Only Arizona State and SMU, each with eight, have more overall major cases.

SMU's still number 1!

Haha.

by **mr. pony** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:27 pm

This stuff hasn't gone on in Austin, has it?

OU shoulda got death. The double-standard shows here big time.

by **jtstang** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:27 pm

They should make them give their bowl money to charity. And not the charity living in their athletic dorm.

by **LonghornFan68** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:32 pm

mr. pony wrote:This stuff hasn't gone on in Austin, has it?

I never said that.

mr. pony wrote:OU shoulda got death. The double-standard shows here big time.

Meh, you know that's never gonna happen again.

by **mr. pony** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:40 pm

just pointing it out, friend.

by **jtstang** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:22 pm

mr. pony wrote:just pointing it out, friend.

That still doesn't mean SMU didn't deserve it.

by **BIGHORSE** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:14 pm

jtstang wrote:
mr. pony wrote:just pointing it out, friend.

That still doesn't mean SMU didn't deserve it.

Nobody said we didnt deserve it ,you just love to take
every chanceyou can to hammer the stangs just like
about your supply and demand rant about s.m.u.shirts
in the stores, would you be mad or happy if we had
shirts in sports stores?

by **expony18** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:18 pm

good ole Dale just gave his thought on espn radio... lots of mentioning of smu in his ranting

by **that's great raplh** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:40 pm

grrrrrrrrrrr!

by **J.T.supporta** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:45 pm

all the people in Waco should be proud...they didnt finish in last place in the big xii in 2005!!!

by **jtstang** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:46 pm

BIGHORSE wrote:
jtstang wrote:
mr. pony wrote:just pointing it out, friend.

That still doesn't mean SMU didn't deserve it.

Nobody said we didnt deserve it ,you just love to take
every chanceyou can to hammer the stangs just like
about your supply and demand rant about s.m.u.shirts
in the stores, would you be mad or happy if we had
shirts in sports stores?

Happy because that would mean our shirts are in demand and in order for that to happen we'd have to be winning again and therefore relevant to the average Dallasite for the first time in over twenty years.

by **mr. pony** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:17 pm

jtstang wrote:That still doesn't mean SMU didn't deserve it.

Sure does.

by **MrMustang1965** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:37 pm

LonghornFan68 wrote:This is Oklahoma's sixth major NCAA infractions case involving football and seventh overall. Only Arizona State and SMU, each with eight, have more overall major cases.

Does anyone know what the time span is for OU's infracations...over how many years did those 7 cases occur? And over how many years did ASU's and SMU's occur?

Also, if Stoops has to forfeit his wins during the 2005 season shouldn't he also have to forfeit his losses, too? The story says his record will go from 86-19 to 78-19. The Sooners went 8-4 and defeated Oregon in the Holiday Bowl.
This also should mean that QB Rhett Bomar (now at Sam Houston State) has an 0-0 record for his collegiate career.

by **BIGHORSE** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:57 pm

HEY JTStang, if academy had some cool s.m.u shirts
right now would that be a good thing,and would you buy one,
or would you complain about it?

NCAA punishes OU

NCAA punishes OU

Who is online