DiamondM wrote:I hope the new Dean at Meadows will help change this attitude, but it is there. And it is stupid. Many many schools of music actually REQUIRE its scholarship wind and percussion players to march in the school's marching band for at least one year. Texas Tech is just one example. This, in part, explains the size of their bands, and in some cases the lackadaisical attitude toward actual marching on the field (they don't want to be there, so they don't put much effort in).
Many schools "require" marching band for at least one year for their Music Education majors. Not many of the top "music performance" programs make such a requirement.
The wind/brass/string departments of the division of music at Meadows are focused on orchestral studies. One of the reasons it recruits well nationally is that the majority of the faculty are in the Dallas Symphony, most being principle players, and they focus on orchestral preparation. If a marching band requirement was added, I am positive it would negatively affect future recruiting.
Like it or not, in the competitive (and shrinking) world of jobs for orchestral musicians, every moment of preparation can make the difference. With the performance major already having orchestra, wind ensemble, chamber music, studio class, brass class, and individual practice on their plate (not too mention a few outside gigs here and there for some pocket money) in additional to the academic courseload is it any wonder some of the teachers would not be thrilled about marching band?
It seems like this comes up every year. The Department of Music has had it focus (orchestral studies) front and center for decades. One of the national draws of Meadows (and something it shares with the Sheppard School at Rice - take a look at how many of their music performance majors are in the "MOB;" next to zero) is it's "conservatory within a university" atmosphere. Marching Band just doesn't fit that profile.