|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by ponyte » Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:20 am
Well, we are 1-3, 1-3. Right where we want to be. This is the big conference opener. They will not expect a strong and motivated SMU team. Our defense showed up and proved it can play and stop people. Our offense was more consistent. Eliminate two mistakes and it is a different game. So what are the analysis/opinions for this week’s game?
-

ponyte

-
- Posts: 11212
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
-
by Billy Joe » Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:38 am
UTEP win. UTEP has better coaching and players. Expect a small crowd.
-

Billy Joe

-
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:34 am
by expony18 » Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:03 am
ponyte wrote:Well, we are 1-3, 1-3. Right where we want to be. This is the big conference opener. They will not expect a strong and motivated SMU team. Our defense showed up and proved it can play and stop people. Our offense was more consistent. Eliminate two mistakes and it is a different game. So what are the analysis/opinions for this week’s game?
win. that's it
WEST DIVISION CHAMPS 2010
-
expony18

-
- Posts: 9968
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:54 pm
by SMUguy » Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:08 am
Predicable answer, BJ.
Ponies showed vast improvement on defense against the Froggies. DeMyron Martin looked determined to run through people. Justin Willis can score on any defense in CUSA. Overrated as he is, Jordan Palmer isn't running the UTEP offense anymore.
Ponies 27
Miners 16
"It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses." ... "Hit it."
-

SMUguy

-
- Posts: 1424
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Carrollton, Texas
by MustangIcon » Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:17 am
SMUguy wrote:Predicable answer, BJ.
Ponies showed vast improvement on defense against the Froggies. DeMyron Martin looked determined to run through people. Justin Willis can score on any defense in CUSA. Overrated as he is, Jordan Palmer isn't running the UTEP offense anymore.
Ponies 27 Miners 16
I am a big Jwill fan, but I'm sorry, our offense DOES NOT look good. It hasn't looked good all season. Our ground game looked good against TCU actually, but second half we abandoned it.
I think our "vast improvement" on D was more related to TCU's inept offense. TCU is #94 in total offense and #99 in scoring offense. That puts them in in the bottom 21 percent or worse of D1a in both categories.
For comparsions sake, we are #71 in total offense and #89 in scoring offense. And we are #105 and #108 in scoring and total defense, even after our "vast improvement" on Saturday.
-
MustangIcon

-
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:29 am
by MustangIcon » Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:31 am
UTEP/SMU is a pick 'em on the lines site I just visited, FYI.
-
MustangIcon

-
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:29 am
by Nacho » Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:33 am
SMU 30
UTEP 29
SMU has turned the corner. We could end up at 6-6.
-
Nacho

-
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
by Special_Delivery_Smu_Fans » Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:33 am
re: "our offense DOES NOT look good"
I certainly know a lot less about X & O's than Rusty Burns, but it appears that all the last second audibles and signals to Justin cause more harm than good.
Pretty much every play the offense is all looking towards the sidelines as the clock ticks down.
I know audibles are common, but why is it that almost every time the SMU offense runs up to the line, we almost never just launch the play?
Wouldn't an occassional play where we call a play and then just snap the ball before the defense has so much time to get set be something of value?
After the huddle breaks and the O-line gets to line of scrimmage you always see Justin standing there looking over to the sideline kind of rolling his hands to "hurry up". Justin seems to have that "come on lets go, get the play called!" look in his eyes.
Do these constant last second changes play any factor in our offense seemingly being out of sink?
"THE SMU BLVD - - NO PLACE ELSE" (retired)
-

Special_Delivery_Smu_Fans

-
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas-Texas-USA
-
by Come and Take It » Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:46 am
Special_Delivery_Smu_Fans wrote:re: "our offense DOES NOT look good"
I certainly know a lot less about X & O's than Rusty Burns, but it appears that all the last second audibles and signals to Justin cause more harm than good.
Pretty much every play the offense is all looking towards the sidelines as the clock ticks down.
I know audibles are common, but why is it that almost every time the SMU offense runs up to the line, we almost never just launch the play?
Wouldn't an occassional play where we call a play and then just snap the ball before the defense has so much time to get set be something of value?
After the huddle breaks and the O-line gets to line of scrimmage you always see Justin standing there looking over to the sideline kind of rolling his hands to "hurry up". Justin seems to have that "come on lets go, get the play called!" look in his eyes.
Do these constant last second changes play any factor in our offense seemingly being out of sink?
When does the huddle ever break? They don't use a huddle. What they are running is a hurry up offense. Instead of huddling, once they line up, they are getting the play from the sidelines. Next time that happens, and you see all the players looking at the sideline, you will notice all the skill players look down and get the play from their play sheet they are wearing.
"Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid." John Wayne
"Context clues and common sense can take you a long way in life." Anthony Cann
-

Come and Take It

-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:52 pm
- Location: Dallas
-
by mustangklick » Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:46 am
there was one play where we hurried the ball, got the snap off, and completed a nice pass (it looked brilliant). TCU even got stuck with 12 people on the field (the point of the hurry up). Anyway, the point is, it might do more good than not to reduce the confusion at the line.
-
mustangklick

-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:51 pm
by MustangStealth » Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:50 am
Special_Delivery_Smu_Fans wrote:I certainly know a lot less about X & O's than Rusty Burns
O is the roundish one between N and P in the song and X is the kinda crossed one that you see on Family Feud. Consider yourself caught up with Rusty.
-

MustangStealth

-
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible
by PK » Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:59 am
Come and Take It wrote:Special_Delivery_Smu_Fans wrote:re: "our offense DOES NOT look good"
I certainly know a lot less about X & O's than Rusty Burns, but it appears that all the last second audibles and signals to Justin cause more harm than good.
Pretty much every play the offense is all looking towards the sidelines as the clock ticks down.
I know audibles are common, but why is it that almost every time the SMU offense runs up to the line, we almost never just launch the play?
Wouldn't an occassional play where we call a play and then just snap the ball before the defense has so much time to get set be something of value?
After the huddle breaks and the O-line gets to line of scrimmage you always see Justin standing there looking over to the sideline kind of rolling his hands to "hurry up". Justin seems to have that "come on lets go, get the play called!" look in his eyes.
Do these constant last second changes play any factor in our offense seemingly being out of sink?
When does the huddle ever break? They don't use a huddle. What they are running is a hurry up offense. Instead of huddling, once they line up, they are getting the play from the sidelines. Next time that happens, and you see all the players looking at the sideline, you will notice all the skill players look down and get the play from their play sheet they are wearing.
In the past , we have usually not huddled, but one thing I noticed in the TCU game was that, on a number of plays, JW and the O-line huddling up prior to the O-line setting up. Maybe it was because of the noise from the TCU fans that caused us to do this, but we did huddle.
-

PK

-
- Posts: 8805
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas 75206
by EmeraldCityPony » Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:09 am
SMU wins 19-15.
Defense continues its upward trend and the offense scores the only touchdown of the game.
It's a crappy job but someone's gotta do it.
-

EmeraldCityPony

-
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
by mrydel » Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:14 am
I think they have been doing this little huddle thing all this year with the OL and Willis. The receivers stay split. I have no idea what they call in the initial huddle.
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by Special_Delivery_Smu_Fans » Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:23 am
So it's a "hurry up offense" but many times we barely get the play off in time due to all the last minutes changes and apparent confusion involving crowd noise and getting everyone on the same page as the clock clicks down?
"THE SMU BLVD - - NO PLACE ELSE" (retired)
-

Special_Delivery_Smu_Fans

-
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas-Texas-USA
-
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests
|
|