|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by SoCal_Pony » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:37 am
PonySnob wrote:Would it be so bad to have a slightly lower graduation rate but get to go to a bowl game every year?
Slightly lower?....what rate is acceptable to you snob?
I'll start at 50%
-

SoCal_Pony

-
- Posts: 5901
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am
by 2112 » Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:16 pm
why does stallion race to defend the criminal longhorns? why does he have so much man love for the horn? bevo could possibly resemble some of those old hags he coaxes out of the saloon at 3:00am 
-
2112

-
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 10:32 am
by jtstang » Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:06 pm
Insane_Pony_Posse wrote:Unlike Stallion and those hoodlums in Austin I think SMU can have a respectable graduate rate and be a competitive football team.
But we don't and we're all sick of it. Please tell us how.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Insane_Pony_Posse » Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:28 pm
re: But we don't and we're all sick of it. Please tell us how.
jtstang are you willing to give orsini a chance? copeland was basically on auto-pilot for years the guy at the top was not passionate and we saw the results i think orsini is a very driven man have you ever spoke with him? this guy is different he is not going to tolerate a pathetic result yeah we have suffered for years but Orsini hasn't lets see what he comes up with post-bennett i betcha you are going to be surprised
C-ya @ Milos!
-

Insane_Pony_Posse

-
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 8:36 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas
-
by jtstang » Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:31 pm
I hope you're right but we sucked before Copeland too.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by LonghornFan68 » Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:24 pm
A lot of players return to finish their degree after they finish a stint in the NFL - something people around here wouldn't know much about.
*ducks*
Official Cult of Chris Phillips Member
-

LonghornFan68

-
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:18 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
-
by LonghornFan68 » Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:32 pm
Oh, and by the way, UT as a school has a graduation rate of about 53%. For some reason there is a culture of career students there. Many people go to school part time and work as well. For some of them it takes them twice as long as most to finish a degree. Are you going to denigrate those people too? The funny part about all of this that UT is STILL ranked above SMU both in athletics and in academics. So keep your graduation rate moral victory. I'll keep looking at my degree up on the wall from a top-10 architecture program while watching my ranked football continue to succeed.
I love you all. 
Official Cult of Chris Phillips Member
-

LonghornFan68

-
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:18 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
-
by abezontar » Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:33 pm
LonghornFan68 wrote:Oh, and by the way, UT as a school has a graduation rate of about 53%. For some reason there is a culture of career students there. Many people go to school part time and work as well. For some of them it takes them twice as long as most to finish a degree. Are you going to denigrate those people too? The funny part about all of this that UT is STILL ranked above SMU both in athletics and in academics. So keep your graduation rate moral victory. I'll keep looking at my degree up on the wall from a top-10 architecture program while watching my ranked football continue to succeed.
that is until you play K-State or OU
The donkey's name is Kiki.
On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?
Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
-

abezontar

-
- Posts: 3888
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Mustang, TX
by LonghornFan68 » Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:34 pm
abezontar wrote:LonghornFan68 wrote:Oh, and by the way, UT as a school has a graduation rate of about 53%. For some reason there is a culture of career students there. Many people go to school part time and work as well. For some of them it takes them twice as long as most to finish a degree. Are you going to denigrate those people too? The funny part about all of this that UT is STILL ranked above SMU both in athletics and in academics. So keep your graduation rate moral victory. I'll keep looking at my degree up on the wall from a top-10 architecture program while watching my ranked football continue to succeed.
that is until you play K-State or OU
I'll give you one of those.
Official Cult of Chris Phillips Member
-

LonghornFan68

-
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:18 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
-
by SMU Football Blog » Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:58 pm
The stated standard for admittance into SMU as an athlete is "probability that the prospective student will graduate." Presumably, that is the criteria for the University as a whole. The graduation rate for the univiserity as a whole is around 67%. The football and basketball teams significantly exceed that figure. Given the time commitment that NCAA athletics require, I see nothing wrong with a graduation that mirrors the undergraduate population as a whole. Further, I see nothing wrong with lowering academic standards to reflect that.
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by bigdaddy08091 » Thu Oct 04, 2007 8:45 pm
Insane_Pony_Posse wrote: OU, UT lag in graduate ratesRival football programs rank among nation's lowest in latest figures Thursday - October 4, 2007 By KATE HAIROPOULOS / The Dallas Morning News Texas and Oklahoma rank poorly in graduating football players, according to figures released Wednesday by the NCAA. The Longhorns' graduation success rate, which is calculated by the NCAA, was 42 percent. Oklahoma's was 44 percent. The only Bowl Subdivision (Division I-A) football programs with lower rates than UT are Georgia (41), Arizona (41) and San Jose State (36). Michigan State was below Oklahoma with 43. The numbers were based on incoming freshmen from 1997 to 2000 graduating within six years. This is the third year the NCAA has released its own data. UT's football program actually improved on a 40 percent rate in the figures released last year. Oklahoma was down from 52 percent. The average graduation rate of Bowl Subdivision football players was 67 percent, up from 65 percent. Men's basketball was the lowest of all sports at 61 percent, but that's up 2 percentage points from last year. "Overall, the trend data is up, and it's very heartening," NCAA president Myles Brand said. "We've seen in the last two years some upward movement. What that's saying is that in the athletic culture, the idea of academic performance ... is taking hold." Baylor (84%), Nebraska (83%), Texas Tech (79%), Kansas State (73%) and Colorado (68%) were the Big 12 football programs that rated higher than the average. SMU had a GSR of 84. Texas ranked second-to-last in the Big 12 in men's basketball, with a GSR of 33. Iowa State had the lowest in the league at 17 percent. The GSR is separate from the Academic Progress Rate, which measures eligibility and retention of athletes to assess penalties. The graduation rate for Division I athletes was 77 percent, the same as last year. Brand reaffirmed his goal of increasing the figure to 80 percent. The NCAA touted year-by-year data showing that the GSR rose from 67.6 percent for male athletes who began college in 1995 to 71.5 percent for those who started their studies in 2000. BIG 12, AREA SCHOOLS Graduation Success Rates, released Wednesday by the NCAA, are based on incoming freshmen from 1997 to 2000. Figures for Big 12 and area colleges in football and men's basketball: BIG 12 School: Football -- Mens BasketballBaylor 84% 58% Colorado 68 55 Iowa State 55 17 Kansas 56 45 Kansas State 73 67 Missouri 60 50 Nebraska 83 47 Oklahoma 44 46 Oklahoma St 64 73 Texas 42% 33% Texas A&M 62 40 Texas Tech 79 44 AREA SCHOOLS School: Football -- Mens Basketball N. Texas 58% 60% SMU 84% 82% TCU 69% 35% http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/spt/colleges/topstories/stories/100407dnspogradrates.37747af.html
Now do a story on how many palyers from whatever schools are in the NFL. Who gives a [deleted] about graduation, you can do that when you are 50. Ask half of this board, which one they would choose?
-
bigdaddy08091

-
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 1:46 pm
by gostangs » Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:37 pm
Top 10 architecture school? That means about as much as our graduation rate. Top ten school for a career path that you cant feed your family by particpating in......great.
-
gostangs

-
- Posts: 12315
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas USA
by couch 'em » Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:18 am
Architects are glorified art students.
I'd like a 0% graduation rate - everyone leaves early for the NFL draft!
-

couch 'em

-
- Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
by LonghornFan68 » Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:59 am
couch 'em wrote:Architects are glorified art students
Right, and lawyers are glorified thieves. And electrical engineers are.. wait, who cares about electrical engineers?
Official Cult of Chris Phillips Member
-

LonghornFan68

-
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 2:18 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
-
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 3 guests
|
|