|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by davidsmu94 » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:11 am
I agree. I know our defense is bad, but this is a pretty banged up S. Miss. team. Also, from what I've seen, nobody in CUSA is heads and shoulders ahead of anyone else. I say it's another tight game, and a toss up at that.
-
davidsmu94

-
- Posts: 1660
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:03 pm
by Pony Fan » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:23 am
Why on earth do you think we would cover?
-

Pony Fan

-
- Posts: 1595
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
by ponyte » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:52 am
Tomorrow is a great day. One all Ponies' fans should be anticpating. Yes, tomorrow is the start of the Women's rowing season. At last, a team with a chance to win and the desire to win and the discipline to win.
Go Ponies!
-

ponyte

-
- Posts: 11212
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
-
by jtstang » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:58 am
Is our cox hot?
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by ponyte » Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:31 am
jtstang wrote:Is our cox hot?
I guess that depends on the stern.
-

ponyte

-
- Posts: 11212
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
-
by SmooBoy » Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:35 am
jtstang wrote:Is our cox hot?
Oar you kidding me? Best strokers around.
-

SmooBoy

-
- Posts: 5820
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Trophy Club
by Water Pony » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:02 am
Anybody else struck by the size of team, roughly 45? Despite having few regional competitors, this team has broad, national appeal.
Pony Up
-

Water Pony

-
- Posts: 5513
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Chicagoland
by Horseshoe » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:13 am
Pony Fan wrote:Why on earth do you think we would cover?
It's a 50-50 thing:
Tech - we didn't cover
NTexas - we covered
Arkie State - we didn't cover
Froggy High - we didn't cover
UTEP - we covered
Time to even up the tally -- WITH A WIN!
-

Horseshoe

-
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Irving, Texas
by Phxfan » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:34 am
Don't even know how to reply. Don't want PB to cover but hate to see SMU lose...............again.
-
Phxfan

-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
by PonyKai » Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:24 pm
Horseshoe wrote:Pony Fan wrote:Why on earth do you think we would cover?
It's a 50-50 thing: Tech - we didn't cover NTexas - we covered Arkie State - we didn't cover Froggy High - we didn't cover UTEP - we covered Time to even up the tally -- WITH A WIN!
Wasn't TCU favored by like 23 1/2? I might be wrong.
-
PonyKai

-
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Here and there.
by MustangIcon » Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:29 pm
ALEX LIFESON wrote:Anyone notice in today's DMN prediction section, that all eight writers predicted S. Miss to not only win, but not ONE thought SMU could even beat the 9 point spread. This is a S. Miss team that was bombed by Boise, and beaten on their own turf by Rice, and down to their THIRD string qb. Not to mention, the Ponies have had two weeks to prepare for. Come on Mustangs, in the name of Doak Walker! 
4th string QB actually I believe. They just moved him back from WR.
You are also forgetting that we let a WR at QB beat us at Rice last year when we had a FAR better D. And that was in front of maybe 10k Rice faithfull at the game? So Miss has the biggest home field advantage in all of CUSA. That plays a pretty big factor when you have a lame duck coach with 4 road wins in 6 seasons in addition to one of the worst defenses you could try to assemble.
-
MustangIcon

-
- Posts: 2604
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:29 am
by SmooBoy » Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:35 pm
Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:Horseshoe wrote:Pony Fan wrote:Why on earth do you think we would cover?
It's a 50-50 thing: Tech - we didn't cover NTexas - we covered Arkie State - we didn't cover Froggy High - we didn't cover UTEP - we covered Time to even up the tally -- WITH A WIN!
Wasn't TCU favored by like 23 1/2? I might be wrong.
Yep, tcu was favored by 21, so we covered unless you are using the new math.
-

SmooBoy

-
- Posts: 5820
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Trophy Club
by perunapower » Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:43 pm
SmooBoy wrote:Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:Horseshoe wrote:Pony Fan wrote:Why on earth do you think we would cover?
It's a 50-50 thing: Tech - we didn't cover NTexas - we covered Arkie State - we didn't cover Froggy High - we didn't cover UTEP - we covered Time to even up the tally -- WITH A WIN!
Wasn't TCU favored by like 23 1/2? I might be wrong.
Yep, tcu was favored by 21, so we covered unless you are using the new math.
He must be using fuzzy math, or as it is better known as Aggie math, because we didn't cover against UTEP, seeing as we were favored.
-

perunapower

-
- Posts: 2501
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:39 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by SMUFan » Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:48 pm
MustangIcon wrote:You are also forgetting that we let a WR at QB beat us at Rice last year...
To be fair, I think many of us could have stood back there and lobbed those passes and Jarrett Dillard would have somehow come down with those, too. He is a great player who had an other-worldly performance that day. Dammit.
-

SMUFan

-
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Addison, Texas
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
|
|