Bottom 10

Pony Soup · Post by **Pony Soup** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:26 pm

Did you expect anything less? Debuting at #10, your SMU Mustangs...

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/stor ... ottom10078

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:39 pm

http://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm

according to the Massey Rankings we are the worst traditional Division 1A program in the country (No. 115) not including schools like Northern Illinois, Florida International, NTSU, Idaho, Louisiana Laffeyette

I see a scheduling opportunity

mr. pony · Post by **mr. pony** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:49 pm

At least Notre Dame is worse.

George S. Patton · Post by **George S. Patton** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:10 pm

firephil wrote:Did you expect anything less? Debuting at #10, your SMU Mustangs...

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/stor ... ottom10078

I'm glad there are people that are really consumed about this non-sense. Again, let's try to focus on how the big picture is about the new regime coming in and establishing something new for the 2008 season and beyond.

2007 SMU football is irrelevant.

SMUtrojanFAN · Post by **SMUtrojanFAN** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:16 pm

George S. Patton wrote:2007 SMU football is irrelevant.

What a difference two months makes...

George S. Patton · Post by **George S. Patton** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:18 pm

SMUtrojanFAN wrote:
George S. Patton wrote:2007 SMU football is irrelevant.

What a difference two months makes...

Unfortunately...

QuikSStang · Post by **QuikSStang** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:57 pm

you think orsini's seen this?

abezontar · Post by **abezontar** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:59 pm

George S. Patton wrote:
firephil wrote:Did you expect anything less? Debuting at #10, your SMU Mustangs...

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/stor ... ottom10078

I'm glad there are people that are really consumed about this non-sense. Again, let's try to focus on how the big picture is about the new regime coming in and establishing something new for the 2008 season and beyond.

2007 SMU football is irrelevant.

As of today, there is no new regime coming in. That may change in the coming weeks and months, but as of today this story is SMU football.

jkflamebo · Post by **jkflamebo** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:03 am

well, were a top 10 football program sooner than expected!

Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex · Post by **Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:15 am

Dang, I was hoping they would have given us "I Lost On Jeopardy."

The line from the song "Don't know what I was thinking of, I guess I just wasn't too bright." seems to sum up the Coaching.

EastStang · Post by **EastStang** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:08 am

I renew my call for a Toilet Bowl. Why should the best teams get an extra six weeks of practice while the worst teams, sit at home and do nothing to improve themselves? The worst two BCS rated teams meeting to determine the truly putrid. You could even get a sponsor, American Standard, Kohler, Lysol, Tidee Bowl, Ridz, or for the truly imaginative, Taco Bell or Chipotle. I can see it now, Notre Dame vs. SMU in a packed telephone booth.

George S. Patton · Post by **George S. Patton** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:10 am

abezontar wrote:
George S. Patton wrote:
firephil wrote:Did you expect anything less? Debuting at #10, your SMU Mustangs...

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/stor ... ottom10078

I'm glad there are people that are really consumed about this non-sense. Again, let's try to focus on how the big picture is about the new regime coming in and establishing something new for the 2008 season and beyond.

2007 SMU football is irrelevant.

As of today, there is no new regime coming in. That may change in the coming weeks and months, but as of today this story is SMU football.

Then that's not forward thinking.

OC Mustang · Post by **OC Mustang** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:38 am

George S. Patton wrote:
abezontar wrote:
George S. Patton wrote:
firephil wrote:Did you expect anything less? Debuting at #10, your SMU Mustangs...

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/stor ... ottom10078

I'm glad there are people that are really consumed about this non-sense. Again, let's try to focus on how the big picture is about the new regime coming in and establishing something new for the 2008 season and beyond.

2007 SMU football is irrelevant.

As of today, there is no new regime coming in. That may change in the coming weeks and months, but as of today this story is SMU football.

Then that's not forward thinking.

No, but it keeping the eye on the ball. Deal with what is in front of you, and plan for the future. Don't look so far ahead that you forget to do the job at hand. I imagine that Orsini has given more than a passing thought to all of this, but I also imagine that he lives in the land of "this is reality", not "this is Wonderland".

that's great raplh · Post by **that's great raplh** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:30 am

top 25 in everything - top10 is better

QuikSStang · Post by **QuikSStang** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:41 am

6th loss of the year. first appearance in the bottom 10. its all coming together now...

Bottom 10

Bottom 10

Re: Bottom 10

Re: Bottom 10

Re: Bottom 10

Re: Bottom 10

Re: Bottom 10

Re: Bottom 10