Cupcakes of The Magnolia Conference

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:17 pm

SMU is 21-57 (.26%) against private schools and academies since the DP-SMU IS 8-38 (.17%) AGAINST SWC PRIVATE SCHOOLS since the DP:

1. Baylor 0-10 (ZERO point ZERO %-Animal House)
2. Rice 3-15 (.16%)
3. TCU 5-13 (.27%)
4. Tulane 2-6 (.25%)
5. Navy 2-5 (.28%)
6. BYU 0-2 (Swept Twinbill)
7. Air Force 0-1 (.00%)
8. ND 0-1 (0.00%)* Exhibition-ND wasn't trying)
9. Vandy 1-1 (.5000000000)
10 Poor Litt' Tulsa 8-3 (.72%- solid C-so your saying there's chance))

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:06 pm

SMU's Magnolia League Record By Coaches:

1. The Great Mike Cavan-Greatest Post DP Coach during Glory Days of SMU's Post DP History-8-13 (.38%)
2. Phil"Give Me One More Chance" Bennett 6-15 (.28%)
3. Tom "I Never Had a Chance" Rossley 6-20 (.23%)
4. Forrest ("Green [Bay]) Gregg 1-9 (.10%)

HorsePower · Post by **HorsePower** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:05 pm

It's really sad how much you enjoy crap like this. More than anything, I feel sorry for you.

PonyKai · Post by **PonyKai** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:34 pm

We get it. We have may had a little trouble winning football games for a few years. Will you shut up now? I think we all may have a bit of an idea.

EastStang · Post by **EastStang** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:16 am

Just hmm a Barry Manilow tune Stallion and you'll feel better!

Billy Joe · Post by **Billy Joe** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:20 am

Excellent stuff....it shows how pathetic SMU football has been. Those are eye-opening statistics. Damn, the truth hurts.....

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:08 am

Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:We get it. We have may had a little trouble winning football games for a few years.

18 years is much closer to 20 years than "a few years"................

that's great raplh · Post by **that's great raplh** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:28 am

the cupcakes at tha magnolia bakery in NYC are pretty tatsy

KnuckleStang · Post by **KnuckleStang** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:32 am

Yeah son. Talkin bout butta-cream

that's great raplh · Post by **that's great raplh** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:58 pm

i am a red velvet fan myself

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:49 pm

Here's an oldie but a goody(updated)

Found an interesting site that compares year ending finishes in the computer Massey rankings:

1989 94 Gregg
1990 104
1991 103 Rossley
1992 79
1993 86
1994 90
1995 100
1996 63
1997 60 Cavan
1998 63
1999 94
2000 100
2001 93
2002 110 Bennett
2003 118
2004 100
2005 83
2006 73
2007 115 (10/24/07)

BRStang · Post by **BRStang** » Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:00 am

Stallion wrote:Here's an oldie but a goody(updated)

Found an interesting site that compares year ending finishes in the computer Massey rankings:

1989 94 Gregg
1990 104
1991 103 Rossley
1992 79
1993 86
1994 90
1995 100
1996 63
1997 60 Cavan
1998 63
1999 94
2000 100
2001 93
2002 110 Bennett
2003 118
2004 100
2005 83
2006 73
2007 115 (10/24/07)

Wow. That's pretty interesting. To me this speaks volumes about Bennett.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:59 pm

BUMP for BRstang who claims that our DOMINANCE of Tulsa proves that SMU is not disadvantaged. Nice call-but unfortunately that is the ONLY series SMU has an advantage in against our other natural and traditional rivals. Not to mention the 5-6 Bowl games and NCAA Tourneys Tulsa has achieved. I'd trade

BRStang · Post by **BRStang** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:26 pm

Stallion wrote:BUMP for BRstang who claims that our DOMINANCE of Tulsa proves that SMU is not disadvantaged. Nice call-but unfortunately that is the ONLY series SMU has an advantage in against our other natural and traditional rivals. Not to mention the 5-6 Bowl games and NCAA Tourneys Tulsa has achieved. I'd trade

I do not claim that we are not disadvantaged. But you claim we are disadvantaged based on your own conclusion that we are disadvantage based on your own belief without proof that we are disadvantaged.

SoCal_Pony · Post by **SoCal_Pony** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:43 pm

Stallion wrote:BUMP for BRstang who claims that our DOMINANCE of Tulsa proves that SMU is not disadvantaged. Nice call-but unfortunately that is the ONLY series SMU has an advantage in against our other natural and traditional rivals. Not to mention the 5-6 Bowl games and NCAA Tourneys Tulsa has achieved. I'd trade

Just to expand on our DOMINANCE of Tulsa.....during our 7-year reign of them, Tulsa went 16-60 against D1-A opponents...ranking them 112 out of 115 schools...

Yep...who wouldn't trade Tulsa's achievements over ours????