At least it is exciting.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:59 am

I'm thinking anything TCU can do SMU can do better. And I invented the Jones argument more famously known worldwide as "SMU must FIRST build a MODEL that will allow it to compete on an even basis with its historical and traditional rivals." You are possibly infringing and diluting my intellectual property/copyright/trademark rights in the Model* by stealing my argument and simply renaming it. I may be have to sick my team of lawyers led by jtstang(aka "peanutass") upon you.

*The Model is the Intellectual Property of Stallion, Inc and any unauthorized use, infringement or dilution of said intellectual property rights may be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

Hoop Fan · Post by **Hoop Fan** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:08 am

Stallion wrote:I'm thinking anything TCU can do SMU can do better. And I invented the Jones argument more famously known worldwide as "SMU must FIRST build a MODEL that will allow it to compete on an even basis with its historical and traditional rivals." You are possibly infringing and diluting my intellectual property/copyright/trademark rights in the Model* by stealing my argument and simply renaming it. I may be have to sick my team of lawyers led by jtstang(aka "peanut [deleted]") upon you.

*The Model is the Intellectual Property of Stallion, Inc and any unauthorized use, infringement or dilution of said intellectual property rights may be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

ya know, i used to think so, but not so sure anymore. SMU as an institution doesn't seem smart enough, savvy enough or aware enough of its surroundings.

Pony Soup · Post by **Pony Soup** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:12 am

Stallion wrote:not any more than 98% of the people that think SMU has lost for 20 years in both FB and BB because of poor coaching. Or that each and every loss is tied to poor coaching. The only difference is that I'm generally right-the 98% of the people that keep hoping to find a miracle coach who will coach 'em into a consistently strong program are wrong-if its accomplished it will be because of a substantial upgrade in talent.

My little pony is so insightful..

Think through this, though. Upgraded talent = consistent winning. Possibly, I guess. That equation does have quite a few holes in it, though, given that the rest of the college football world is likely to change as time passes. It also assumes that talent can just be instantaneously upgraded. Not likely.

I am going to spare myself the time of suggesting how to win because I dont want to read the reply about "didn't you read my model??? I am right 98% of the time...I AM SMU FOOTBALL"

Models are good to look at but if ever have to hear one speak, just start running... They should all just stick to magazine covers...
[/quote]

bigdaddy08091 · Post by **bigdaddy08091** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:46 am

Stallion wrote:I'm thinking anything TCU can do SMU can do better. And I invented the Jones argument more famously known worldwide as "SMU must FIRST build a MODEL that will allow it to compete on an even basis with its historical and traditional rivals." You are possibly infringing and diluting my intellectual property/copyright/trademark rights in the Model* by stealing my argument and simply renaming it. I may be have to sick my team of lawyers led by jtstang(aka "peanutass") upon you.

*The Model is the Intellectual Property of Stallion, Inc and any unauthorized use, infringement or dilution of said intellectual property rights may be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

(: (: No lawyers please! Your a good dude Stallion and thanks for reading and responding to my crap. I could turn this thing around in one year, but Turner and board of regents would fire me after on season because I would win, fill the stands and bring football players to school.

cguru · Post by **cguru** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:56 am

Stallion, for those of us who have a life and don't have time to go back and look for your "MODEL," please explain. I'm curious how you would change an entire University in one night to make a football team competitive.

couch 'em · Post by **couch 'em** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:00 pm

cguru wrote:Stallion, for those of us who have a life and don't have time to go back and look for your "MODEL," please explain. I'm curious how you would change an entire University in one night to make a football team competitive.

That's The Model├â┬ó├óΓé¼┼╛├é┬ó

(sorry, just wanted to work ├â┬ó├óΓé¼┼╛├é┬ó in there.

cguru · Post by **cguru** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:03 pm

Ok, so change everything that is this University that everyone so loves. Makes sense.

Pony Soup · Post by **Pony Soup** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:13 pm

couch 'em wrote:
cguru wrote:Stallion, for those of us who have a life and don't have time to go back and look for your "MODEL," please explain. I'm curious how you would change an entire University in one night to make a football team competitive.

That's The Model├â┬ó├óΓé¼┼╛├é┬ó

(sorry, just wanted to work ├â┬ó├óΓé¼┼╛├é┬ó in there.

The Effort├â┬ó├óΓé¼┼╛├é┬ó is much appreciated!

bigdaddy08091 · Post by **bigdaddy08091** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:13 pm

firephil wrote:
Stallion wrote:not any more than 98% of the people that think SMU has lost for 20 years in both FB and BB because of poor coaching. Or that each and every loss is tied to poor coaching. The only difference is that I'm generally right-the 98% of the people that keep hoping to find a miracle coach who will coach 'em into a consistently strong program are wrong-if its accomplished it will be because of a substantial upgrade in talent.

My little pony is so insightful..

Think through this, though. Upgraded talent = consistent winning. Possibly, I guess. That equation does have quite a few holes in it, though, given that the rest of the college football world is likely to change as time passes. It also assumes that talent can just be instantaneously upgraded. Not likely.

I am going to spare myself the time of suggesting how to win because I dont want to read the reply about "didn't you read my model??? I am right 98% of the time...I AM SMU FOOTBALL"

Models are good to look at but if ever have to hear one speak, just start running... They should all just stick to magazine covers...

[/quote]

Please suggest to us how we are to win. Obviously in 20 years nobody else has had an idea, so yours cannot be any worse. On top of that start a suggestion box. At this point I am willing to listen to the grandparents, inlaws, and children.

Pony Soup · Post by **Pony Soup** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:16 pm

I will soon, no time now... Just decided to pass on the TX Nebraska game so I am going to grab lunch, pay cstv, and get hyped for the stangs.

Today is for Jim Caswell, people. Let's get one for the man who embodied everything we all love about the Hilltop.

bigdaddy08091 · Post by **bigdaddy08091** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:44 pm

firephil wrote:I will soon, no time now... Just decided to pass on the TX Nebraska game so I am going to grab lunch, pay cstv, and get hyped for the stangs.

Today is for Jim Caswell, people. Let's get one for the man who embodied everything we all love about the Hilltop.

You don't have a clue do you? Your name must be Gerald Turner?

ALEX LIFESON · Post by **ALEX LIFESON** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:48 pm

You just joined in October 2006.........and your connection is?????

bigdaddy08091 · Post by **bigdaddy08091** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:50 pm

cguru wrote:Ok, so change everything that is this University that everyone so loves. Makes sense.

Like loosing? Are you a freaking idiot or what? The little snobby nosed business majors and gay as art majors don't wanna share the wealth with athletics.

Pony Soup · Post by **Pony Soup** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:51 pm

bigdaddy08091 wrote:
You don't have a clue do you? Your name must be Gerald Turner?

What are you talking about?

bigdaddy08091 · Post by **bigdaddy08091** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:01 pm

ALEX LIFESON wrote:You just joined in October 2006.........and your connection is?????

What is your connection [deleted]???