OK Here is Is

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:50 pm

Good Football teams with good football players can drive 1 yard on 4th down. I see every genius on the board blaming this loss on Phil Bennett. Nope. They were not physically Man Enough to get the job done. Don't give the players an out-they failed to get the job done

RE Tycoon · Post by **RE Tycoon** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:51 pm

I agree, Martin should put that ball in. What has happened to him? So tentative.

thefamousguy · Post by **thefamousguy** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:51 pm

Stallion wrote:Good Football teams with good football teams can drive 1 yard on 4th down. I see every genius on the board blaming this loss on Phil Bennett. Nope. They were not physically Nan Enough to get the job done. Don't give the players an out-they failed to get the job done

Stallion you are a JOKE! :lol:

DEMYRON HAD NOT GAINED MUCH MORE THAN TWO YARDS ON A CARRY ALL DAY ( THIS SEASON TO THINK OF IT) AND YOU PUT THE GAME IN HIS HANDS? COME ON?

Pony94 · Post by **Pony94** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:53 pm

The players run the plays called. And they ran that same play four times. To put the blame on the players on this is YOUR out. Our players played well enough to win this one, but when you are in so many close games and LOSE EVERY SINGLE ONE....I think coaching has a lot to do with that.

And yes, I am a Mensa member, thanks.

Pony Soup · Post by **Pony Soup** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:54 pm

My little pony is DEAD wrong. The coaches failed to manage this game, and it is more their fault that we lost than the players. As a coach, you have to give the team the best opportunity to win, and we never do. Phil Bennett's decisions in this game, and in the last game, set up these two losses and he will be given his due quite soon. Goodbye Phil, it's been a long and painful era on the Hilltop.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:54 pm

and they were not MAN enough to get the job done.

Pony Soup · Post by **Pony Soup** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:55 pm

Stallion has just lost most, if not all, credibility with that post. He is, in fact, a joke.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:55 pm

Good Football Teams with good players do not let teams go 99 yards for the 5 or 6th time this year

Pony Soup · Post by **Pony Soup** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:56 pm

stop talking sir

Pony94 · Post by **Pony94** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:56 pm

firephil wrote:stop talking sir

I agree!

thefamousguy · Post by **thefamousguy** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:57 pm

firephil wrote:My little pony is DEAD wrong. The coaches failed to manage this game, and it is more their fault that we lost than the players. As a coach, you have to give the team the best opportunity to win, and we never do. Phil Bennett's decisions in this game, and in the last game, set up these two losses and he will be given his due quite soon. Goodbye Phil, it's been a long and painful era on the Hilltop.

WELL PUT. THE NEW COACH WILL TAKE THE SAME ATHLETES BENNETT HAS WASTED AND EASILY PUT TOGETHER A WINNING SEASON. THEN WE WILL NO LONGER HAVE TO LISTEN TO STALLION'S GARBAGE.

MustangStealth · Post by **MustangStealth** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:58 pm

Stallion wrote:Good Football Teams with good players do not let teams go 99 yards for the 5 or 6th time this year

And good football coaches evaluate their talent in the offseason and have figured out who the best players are at each position before the 8th game of the season.

Pony Soup · Post by **Pony Soup** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:59 pm

MustangStealth wrote:
Stallion wrote:Good Football Teams with good players do not let teams go 99 yards for the 5 or 6th time this year

And good football coaches evaluate their talent in the offseason and have figured out who the best players are at each position before the 8th game of the season.

WELL SAID

that's great raplh · Post by **that's great raplh** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:59 pm

you put it in jwills hands

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 6:00 pm

The SMU Football Team failed to get the job done. Next excuse.

OK Here is Is

OK Here is Is

Re: OK Here is Is