PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

What's Worse than Being Rated Behind a Division 1-AA Con.?

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: What's Worse than Being Rated Behind a Division 1-AA Con.?

Postby MrMustang1965 » Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:16 am

Stallion wrote:Being rated behind two Division 1-AA Conferences

CONFERENCE CENTRAL MEAN SIMPLE AVERAGE TEAMS

1 SOUTHEASTERN (A) = 80.77 80.40 ( 1) 12
2 BIG 12 (A) = 78.25 77.60 ( 5) 12
3 BIG EAST (A) = 78.23 77.64 ( 4) 8
4 ATLANTIC COAST (A) = 77.83 77.65 ( 3) 12
5 PAC-10 (A) = 77.68 78.05 ( 2) 10
6 BIG TEN (A) = 74.66 74.81 ( 6) 11
7 MOUNTAIN WEST (A) = 68.91 68.55 ( 7) 9
8 I-A INDEPENDENTS (A) = 62.83 63.13 ( 8) 4
9 WESTERN ATHLETIC (A) = 61.70 62.17 ( 9) 9
10 SOUTHERN (AA)= 60.97 60.43 ( 10) 8
11 MID-AMERICAN (A) = 60.19 60.41 ( 11) 13
12 COLONIAL (AA)= 59.22 58.38 ( 13) 12
13 CONFERENCE USA (A) = 58.60 59.00 ( 12) 12
14 GATEWAY (AA)= 57.58 55.73 ( 15) 7
15 SUN BELT (A) = 56.15 56.20 ( 14) 8
16 GREAT WEST (AA)= 53.59 54.42 ( 16) 5
17 PATRIOT LEAGUE (AA)= 45.39 44.41 ( 20) 7
18 SOUTHLAND (AA)= 44.87 44.96 ( 17) 8
19 BIG SKY (AA)= 43.88 44.46 ( 19) 9
20 IVY LEAGUE (AA)= 43.62 44.52 ( 18) 8
21 SOUTHWESTERN (AA)= 41.53 41.29 ( 22) 10
22 BIG SOUTH (AA)= 41.24 41.37 ( 21) 5
23 MID-EASTERN (AA)= 41.24 40.54 ( 23) 10
24 OHIO VALLEY (AA)= 37.94 38.44 ( 24) 10
25 PIONEER (AA)= 36.08 35.83 ( 25) 8
26 I-AA INDEPENDENTS (AA)= 32.87 31.92 ( 26) 4
27 NORTHEAST (AA)= 30.76 30.57 ( 27) 7
28 METRO ATLANTIC (AA)= 18.54 17.96 ( 28) 4
29 ***UNRATED*** (**)= -90.00 -90.00 (
For someone who stresses time-and-time again on this board how other posters don't get it right or are morons, idiots, [deleted]*s, etc., you still continue to call it Div. 1-AA. It is no longer Div. 1-AA but Div. 1-A FCS (Football Championship Subdivision). It became Div. 1-A FCS in 2006. It has a 'true' national championship game determined thru a playoff system, unlike the Div. 1-A FBS (Football Bowl Subdivision).
User avatar
MrMustang1965
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11161
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Dallas,TX,USA

Re: What's Worse than Being Rated Behind a Division 1-AA Con.?

Postby ReedFrawg » Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:30 am

It will always be Div 1A and Div 1AA to me.
ReedFrawg
Heisman
 
Posts: 1936
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Fort Worth, TX, US

Re: What's Worse than Being Rated Behind a Division 1-AA Con.?

Postby MrMustang1965 » Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:35 am

ReedFrawg wrote:It will always be Div 1A and Div 1AA to me.
Thanks for proving the value of a TCU education.
User avatar
MrMustang1965
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11161
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Dallas,TX,USA

Postby Stallion » Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:36 am

yeah and I don't call it the Tostitos Fiesta Bowl either. The Ncaa is simply using a technique trying to blur the lines between what we know is reality. Call it what you want.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Postby MrMustang1965 » Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:41 am

Stallion wrote:yeah and I don't call it the Tostitos Fiesta Bowl. The Ncaa is simply using a technique trying to blur the lines between what we know is reality. Call it what you want.
Thanks. I will.

And the reality is that Div. 1 FCS has the correct 'model' for determining a 'true' national champion, unlike Div. 1 FBS. There's no blur there.
User avatar
MrMustang1965
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11161
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Dallas,TX,USA

Re: What's Worse than Being Rated Behind a Division 1-AA Con.?

Postby ReedFrawg » Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:42 am

MrMustang1965 wrote:
ReedFrawg wrote:It will always be Div 1A and Div 1AA to me.
Thanks for proving the value of a TCU education.


No problem - I think the NCAA is full of cr*p with these new names. What's their point? Football Bowl Subdivision???? C'mon.
ReedFrawg
Heisman
 
Posts: 1936
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Fort Worth, TX, US

Re: What's Worse than Being Rated Behind a Division 1-AA Con.?

Postby MrMustang1965 » Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:50 am

ReedFrawg wrote:
MrMustang1965 wrote:
ReedFrawg wrote:It will always be Div 1A and Div 1AA to me.
Thanks for proving the value of a TCU education.


No problem - I think the NCAA is full of cr*p with these new names. What's their point? Football Bowl Subdivision???? C'mon.
The point, Froggie, is showing that programs like SMU, TCU, etc. will never compete for a 'true' national championship in their classification, unlike programs like Appalachian State, Furman, Delaware, etc.
User avatar
MrMustang1965
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11161
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Dallas,TX,USA

Postby MustangStealth » Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:51 am

MrMustang1965 wrote:And the reality is that Div. 1 FCS has the correct 'model' for determining a 'true' national champion, unlike Div. 1 FBS. There's no blur there.


True, but I'd rather see SMU win the Liberty Bowl than the FCS national championship.
User avatar
MustangStealth
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4093
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible

Re: What's Worse than Being Rated Behind a Division 1-AA Con.?

Postby ReedFrawg » Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:04 am

The point, Froggie, is showing that programs like SMU, TCU, etc. will never compete for a 'true' national championship in their classification, unlike programs like Appalachian State, Furman, Delaware, etc.[/quote]

I think we both agree that the FCS is the right model. I just think these new names are a joke. How is changing the names of the divisions equal to "showing that programs like SMU, TCU, etc. will never compete for a 'true' national championship in their classification"? I guess I just don't get that. Anyway...that's not the point either....I do get that the Div 1AA schools get to play for a true championship while we in the FBS are stuck with an idiotic bowl system.
ReedFrawg
Heisman
 
Posts: 1936
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Fort Worth, TX, US

Postby ponyboy » Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:18 am

jtstang wrote:
ponyboy wrote:I don't understand how it helps our situation to be pointing out this stuff 24x7. Especially now when we're trying to attract a coach. Please explain.

It may not help, but it doesn't hurt to vent frustration here either--we do not want a coach who reads and relies on message boards as part of their decision-making process, same as recruits.


At some point haven't you vented? I've never known someone to vent every living breathing hour. To research hours so that he can vent. To vent as if he's billing for it. I mean really.
ponyboy
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 15134
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: University Park,TX US

Postby Stallion » Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:07 pm

I'm still allowed to vent at 1-7 with no bowl or championships in year 18. I'll stop venting when I know the restrictions are gone even if that's before we win. I've been tightly focused to that issue for 18 years.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Postby ponyboy » Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:10 pm

We noticed the "tight focus." Just want to make sure that focus helps more than your sense of self satisfaction.
ponyboy
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 15134
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: University Park,TX US

Previous

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests