PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby HixsontoLeVias » Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:15 am

....oh, so now Miami is our "model"?? If THAT'S the case, let's just go ahead and shut this thing down....some might say we are "past the point of return..", we will NEVER re :hmm: gain respectability..I don't buy this, but....we need to start showing some progress, some mo....NOW!! Long Live Ricky Wesson.
HixsontoLeVias
All-American
 
Posts: 567
Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 3:01 am

Re: I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby abezontar » Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:19 am

I dont' think I have ever heard anyone say that Georgia Tech was our model, where did you get that?
The donkey's name is Kiki.

On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?

Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
User avatar
abezontar
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3888
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Mustang, TX

Re: I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby NavyCrimson » Mon Oct 06, 2003 12:09 pm

mid 90's when the dmn published a 1-2 page article with interviews from several administrators at that time.
BRING BACK THE GLORY DAYS OF SMU FOOTBALL!!!

For some strange reason, one of the few universities that REFUSE to use their school colors: Harvard Crimson & Yale Blue.
User avatar
NavyCrimson
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3163
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Simi Valley-CA (Hm of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library)

Re: I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby abezontar » Mon Oct 06, 2003 12:40 pm

ah....is that still who we are attempting to model our program after?
The donkey's name is Kiki.

On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?

Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
User avatar
abezontar
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3888
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Mustang, TX

Re: I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby Nacho » Mon Oct 06, 2003 1:17 pm

Bennett said our model is Miami. I'm going with that. Question: How do we know that our model really isn't Temple? Maybe that Miami thing was some kind of hoax. I digress. Miami seems to do okay with the Miami model. Let's keep it. 4 more years!
Nacho
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6043
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am

Re: I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby EastStang » Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:34 pm

Temple is a state school. Miami is a private school in a large metorpolitan area. There are two models we could follow for football: Miami or Rice/Duke. We, of course have followed the latter and are now trying to redirect toward the former.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12659
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby FloridaMustang » Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:49 pm

Duke is in a major metropolitan area? Have you ever been to Durham? :w00t:
User avatar
FloridaMustang
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2129
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Denver, Colorado

Re: I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby No Quarter » Wed Oct 08, 2003 6:06 pm

If Bennett said Miami is the model for SMU, maybe he meant the school in Ohio?
No Quarter
Heisman
 
Posts: 1509
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2000 4:01 am

Re: I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby Charleston Pony » Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:09 pm

If Miami is in fact our model (meaning big time football can be played at a small private school in the middle of a major metropolitan area), do we start by renaming the school the University of Dallas? Or, do we convince the powers that be that SMU needs to offer "Exercise and Sports Sciences" programs like Miami does? I especially like their program in "Athletic Training". You won't hear our administration say SMU will follow the Miami model to athletic success, because you aren't likely to ever see those kind of programs at SMU. Realistically, that's what it would probably take for SMU to compete again at that level (not to mention violating NCAA rules in recruiting).
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 28912
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Re: I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby i10pony » Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:29 pm

Hey,

I'm all about exercise science and sports management programs. I'm also all about the recruiting violations. But lets be smart about it this time if we're gonna do it. As the great Jim Rome says "If you're not cheating, you're not trying, and its only cheating if you get caught."
i10pony
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Houston,TX, USA

Re: I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby i10pony » Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:31 pm

I'm just joking but I wish SMU could get away with that stuff and recieve a slap on the hand ala Arkansas, Alabama, Auburn, A$M, UH, Notre Dame, F$U....and the list goes on.
i10pony
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Houston,TX, USA

Re: I Thought Georgia Tech was our "model"??

Postby SoCal_Pony » Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:44 pm

CP,

How about legitimate PE and kinesiology degrees so our athletes have the opportunity at careers in sports medicine, health training or coaching.

Since UT and A$M are our academic equivalents, use their JC admission standards.

Do this and I am satisfied.

No need for “Harrick-taught” or “athletic training” courses.
User avatar
SoCal_Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests