|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Phxfan » Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:12 pm
On 10/14/07 I posted SMU was owned by the UMC. Some on this board disputed this. I also stated that Duke was owned by the UMC, some disputed that. It was an effort to get to the people that really make the decisions about $ to pay coaches and how to influence them to get the church to "Pony Up". So go to Google News, then SMU, then blogs. You will find an article by William M. Finnin Jr. The SMU Chaplin or some position like that. He makes it very clear about the ownership of SMU, Duke and a few other Universities including Northwestern. (Barnett) So for those that said I was not dealing with a full deck, please reconsider.
-
Phxfan

-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
by Phxfan » Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:14 pm
Phxfan wrote:On 10/14/07 I posted SMU was owned by the UMC. Some on this board disputed this. I also stated that Duke was owned by the UMC, some disputed that. It was an effort to get to the people that really make the decisions about $ to pay coaches and how to influence them to get the church to "Pony Up". So go to Google News, then SMU, then blogs. You will find an article by William M. Finnin Jr. The SMU Chaplin or some position like that. He makes it very clear about the ownership of SMU, Duke and a few other Universities including Northwestern. (Barnett) So for those that said I was not dealing with a full deck, please reconsider.
Sorry about the typo on the topic.
-
Phxfan

-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
by Pony Soup » Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:39 pm
Just dont let it happen again
-
Pony Soup

-
- Posts: 3471
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: Austin, Tx
by Phxfan » Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:49 pm
firephil wrote:Just dont let it happen again
I'd promiseee that but duoblt I could kep ti. OKY DOKY
-
Phxfan

-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
by Phxfan » Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:09 pm
mrydel wrote:Why don't you just edit it? 
Pretty new to this board. Don't know the in's and outs. If I were to edit it now the whole thing would not make sense because I would be apologising for something that didn't happen. Does that make sense?
-
Phxfan

-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
by DiamondM75 » Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:10 pm
Phxfan wrote:On 10/14/07 I posted SMU was owned by the UMC. Some on this board disputed this. I also stated that Duke was owned by the UMC, some disputed that. It was an effort to get to the people that really make the decisions about $ to pay coaches and how to influence them to get the church to "Pony Up". So go to Google News, then SMU, then blogs. You will find an article by William M. Finnin Jr. The SMU Chaplin or some position like that. He makes it very clear about the ownership of SMU, Duke and a few other Universities including Northwestern. (Barnett) So for those that said I was not dealing with a full deck, please reconsider.
Why don't you just copy and paste the address? I can not find an article by Finnin on SMU in the first 5 pages of GOOGLE blogs on SMU.
Just send 'da money.
-

DiamondM75

-
- Posts: 2967
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:04 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas
-
by mrydel » Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:13 pm
Phxfan wrote:mrydel wrote:Why don't you just edit it? 
Pretty new to this board. Don't know the in's and outs. If I were to edit it now the whole thing would not make sense because I would be apologising for something that didn't happen. Does that make sense?
Makes as much sense as anything I ever post.
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by PK » Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:18 pm
mrydel wrote:Phxfan wrote:mrydel wrote:Why don't you just edit it? 
Pretty new to this board. Don't know the in's and outs. If I were to edit it now the whole thing would not make sense because I would be apologising for something that didn't happen. Does that make sense?
Makes as much sense as anything I ever post.
Would that be defined as a low bar. 
-

PK

-
- Posts: 8805
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas 75206
by Phxfan » Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:21 pm
DiamondM75 wrote:Phxfan wrote:On 10/14/07 I posted SMU was owned by the UMC. Some on this board disputed this. I also stated that Duke was owned by the UMC, some disputed that. It was an effort to get to the people that really make the decisions about $ to pay coaches and how to influence them to get the church to "Pony Up". So go to Google News, then SMU, then blogs. You will find an article by William M. Finnin Jr. The SMU Chaplin or some position like that. He makes it very clear about the ownership of SMU, Duke and a few other Universities including Northwestern. (Barnett) So for those that said I was not dealing with a full deck, please reconsider.
Why don't you just copy and paste the address? I can not find an article by Finnin on SMU in the first 5 pages of GOOGLE blogs on SMU.
I can't get the computer to do it. So, go to Google news SMU, then hit blogs, then go to an article stating something like what does the "M" in SMU mean. If someone can get a direct link please post it.
-
Phxfan

-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
by Phxfan » Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:01 pm
jtstang wrote:http://www.umportal.org/main/article.asp?id=2718
Thanks, feels good to be right sometimes.
-
Phxfan

-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
by smupony94 » Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:13 pm
Phxfan wrote:jtstang wrote:http://www.umportal.org/main/article.asp?id=2718
Thanks, feels good to be right sometimes.
Don't get too comfortable
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by Phxfan » Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:38 pm
smupony94 wrote:Phxfan wrote:jtstang wrote:http://www.umportal.org/main/article.asp?id=2718
Thanks, feels good to be right sometimes.
Don't get too comfortable
OK. This whole thing about coaching staff is related to the Universities affiliation to a religious denomination. Again I would say that those who want a good /excellent program at SMU should consider writing an E-mail to UMC.ORG. Explain your reasons etc. The church has more $ than the Hunts. Notre Dame is supported by the Catholic Church. The UMC is giving $ to several universities. SMU is the only one to own the name. They got upset over the DP and need to get over it. SMU will not hire someone with a messy "moral" past. (sex stuff). That excludes a couple of those mentioned on this board. So it's going to Bowden if we come up with a decent salary, what he wants.... SO.... Give him the $ and lets win.
-
Phxfan

-
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
by smupony94 » Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:42 pm
Phxfan wrote:smupony94 wrote:Phxfan wrote:jtstang wrote:http://www.umportal.org/main/article.asp?id=2718
Thanks, feels good to be right sometimes.
Don't get too comfortable
OK. This whole thing about coaching staff is related to the Universities affiliation to a religious denomination. Again I would say that those who want a good /excellent program at SMU should consider writing an E-mail to UMC.ORG. Explain your reasons etc. The church has more $ than the Hunts. Notre Dame is supported by the Catholic Church. The UMC is giving $ to several universities. SMU is the only one to own the name. They got upset over the DP and need to get over it. SMU will not hire someone with a messy "moral" past. (sex stuff). That excludes a couple of those mentioned on this board. So it's going to Bowden if we come up with a decent salary, what he wants.... SO.... Give him the $ and lets win.
They are mad about the Bush Library too
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests
|
|