Observations

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:01 pm

It's simple as this:

If you're for Krapthorpe then you are against Barnett (Barnett said he wants the job)

And if that is the case then I think you seriously lack knowlege on what it takes to win at SMU.

by **J.T.supporta** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:03 pm

WhitneyHouston wrote:It's simple as this:

If you're for Krapthorpe then you are against Barnett (Barnett said he wants the job)

And if that is the case then I think you seriously lack knowlege on what it takes to win at SMU.

NO ONE KNOWS WHAT IT TAKES TO WIN AT SMU...its like a roller coaster here...up and down and up and down

i want barnett...but i thought u wanted bowden...

by **Buckethead** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:05 pm

I don't remember the up part only the down part.

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:14 pm

This message board in 3 years:

"Bennett set us back 7 years, we have to wait until Kragthorpe gets his players in here before we can get to the New Orleans Bowl"

I want to throwup

by **J.T.supporta** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:18 pm

WhitneyHouston wrote:This message board in 3 years:

"Bennett set us back 7 years, we have to wait until Kragthorpe gets his players in here before we can get to the New Orleans Bowl"

I want to throwup

then you might as well say Turner set us back 7 years too...but i dont think that will happen

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:39 pm

This just in, Krap wouldn't just set back our program, he would end our program

by **perunapower** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:56 pm

SMU Football Blog wrote:
WhitneyHouston wrote:SMU Blog,

I guess [deleted] Vermeil being out of Football for 12 years really effected his performance. Or, Bill Parcells being away from the game for 6 years. Please tell me though, since I am so uninformed, why Krag is such a great great choice. I'm listening.....

I simply am not dismissive of anybody (except Greg Davis). I am not a big fan of the people that seem obsessed with their guy at the exclusion of all others. I think that is a big mistake because you may be very disappointed. I have defended Kragthorpe enough. I have defended Bowden enough. I have discussed Barnett enough.

Any coach SMU hires is going to have some baggage.

"Life's too short babe, time is flying, i'm looking for baggage that goes with mine."

Yeah, I just quoted the musical "Rent." You have a problem with that?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=piChUkmYjVI&feature=related

by **OC Mustang** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 5:06 pm

J.T.supporta wrote:
WhitneyHouston wrote:This message board in 3 years:

"Bennett set us back 7 years, we have to wait until Kragthorpe gets his players in here before we can get to the New Orleans Bowl"

I want to throwup

then you might as well say Turner set us back 7 years too...but i dont think that will happen

Already happened.

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 5:06 pm

I think my observation is turning out to be right.

by **SmooBoy** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 5:16 pm

It's time to go home with the Bodyguard...

by **ponygrad90** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 6:00 pm

As yourself this question, who had the most to gain with Bennett's removal?

It's bigger than anything you can imagine-

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 6:05 pm

Bigger then the Death Star?

Observations

Who is online