originaloverthehilltop1 wrote:jkflamebo wrote:mt327 wrote:You obviously didn't take economics at SMU
taking it with batra right now
that should be worth ten steps back.
in fact, i literally got a 100 on the last test
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
originaloverthehilltop1 wrote:jkflamebo wrote:mt327 wrote:You obviously didn't take economics at SMU
taking it with batra right now
that should be worth ten steps back.
The XtC wrote:Pony Ride wrote:mt327 wrote:You obviously didn't take economics at SMU
I was about to type "supply and demand" then I see this post. Glad somebody actually got something out of their education.
I'm familiar with Keynesian theory and supply and demand curves. The problem is someone in the athletic department has figured out that at this point demand for SMU tickets has reached a point of relative Inflexibility. Meaning that lowering prices wont result in a significant increase in number of tickets sold, and raising prices wont result in a significant decrease. The people who are still buying season tickets are the diehards, the people who are going to watch the game, come Hell or high water. People not buying season tickets.... most of them are only vaguely aware that the games are going to occur, and you couldnt drag them there with a rope around their neck.
The typical season ticket buyer at this point will buy the exact same number of tickets at $50 dollars each as he would for $10 each. He has to have his tickets, no way around it. But there's no point in buying any extra, because he couldnt convince anyone to come with him even if he used a shotgun. That's Inflexible Demand.
I'm exagerating a tiny bit here. but you get the picture. The Athletic Deparment loses a handful of fans over raising ticket prices, but the increased revenue surpasses the losses. There will be a breaking point to this, a price where the diehards give up, and then it all comes crashing down hard, but the department will try to maximize their revenue until they reach that point.
SWC2010 wrote:that the new Coach will get paid way too much for what he will deliver... and I'm okay with that for a season or two.
Who pays this $1.6MM? It ain't these mysterious "rich" alum-- it's all us season ticket holders who will front the bill for the new HC.
Same way JJ is gonna pay for Romo's 60+MM deal
I think I liked it better when the players got paid more than the coaches
SMU89 wrote:SWC2010 wrote:that the new Coach will get paid way too much for what he will deliver... and I'm okay with that for a season or two.
Who pays this $1.6MM? It ain't these mysterious "rich" alum-- it's all us season ticket holders who will front the bill for the new HC.
Same way JJ is gonna pay for Romo's 60+MM deal
I think I liked it better when the players got paid more than the coaches
I'm sure Ford, Hunt and others like driving by an empty stadium they paid for several years ago.
Given the new lending environment, it would be very difficult for them to come up with $10+ million to buyout Phil and bring someone else in.
Completely Clueless.
BrianTinBigD wrote:I was thinking that the easiest way to raise the money is include in the student fees a cost of buying new Student seating tickets at $50 per game or at $300 a year. If you actually show up and attend the game you can get a refund of $25 paid out at the end of the game in Mustang Money that can only be redeemed at the next football game for concessions or souvenirs. Run that out over 11,000 students and assume that the standard 1000 would acctually attend we will easily raise $3million a year from our students.
Dutch wrote:BrianTinBigD wrote:I was thinking that the easiest way to raise the money is include in the student fees a cost of buying new Student seating tickets at $50 per game or at $300 a year. If you actually show up and attend the game you can get a refund of $25 paid out at the end of the game in Mustang Money that can only be redeemed at the next football game for concessions or souvenirs. Run that out over 11,000 students and assume that the standard 1000 would acctually attend we will easily raise $3million a year from our students.
unless something has changed, tickets are part of the fee "package" paid each semester. students just have to show their student ID to get in.
perunapower wrote:Dutch wrote:BrianTinBigD wrote:I was thinking that the easiest way to raise the money is include in the student fees a cost of buying new Student seating tickets at $50 per game or at $300 a year. If you actually show up and attend the game you can get a refund of $25 paid out at the end of the game in Mustang Money that can only be redeemed at the next football game for concessions or souvenirs. Run that out over 11,000 students and assume that the standard 1000 would acctually attend we will easily raise $3million a year from our students.
unless something has changed, tickets are part of the fee "package" paid each semester. students just have to show their student ID to get in.
It is.