PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Advice: Get This Done Now

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Advice: Get This Done Now

Postby Stallion » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:15 am

if SMU wants Fran I sure hope they proceed quickly. Just a reminder-the lay of the land could change in hours as quickly as rumors spread on the UCLA and West Virgina jobs and the puddles they may cause. What happens when the NFL Coaches start getting fired. I see scenarios in which SMU could once again be jilted at the alter. Whoever is the target needs to be tied down. This false sense of security that Orsini talks about in the "Dead Period" is a mirage. But hey we'll always have Coker because no body would be dumb enough to offer him a job.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Postby QuikSStang » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:18 am

did they ever make a decision on the buyout clause in his contract with A&M? i keep seeing random articles about $4.4M or something like that. Can anyone explain?
Image
User avatar
QuikSStang
Heisman
 
Posts: 1519
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Dalla$

Postby SMU Football Blog » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:20 am

The buyout is public information; you can find a copy on the DMN website.
User avatar
SMU Football Blog
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4418
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: North Dallas, Texas

Postby ponyinNC » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:21 am

i see $4.4MM as well.

And here's a question for my law school buddies tha paid attention in employment law...

is it possible to have a non-compete clause in the buyout?? How would that work?? Isn't A&M on our future schedule??
User avatar
ponyinNC
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4974
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:55 am
Location: Wrightsville Beach, N.C.

Postby jackspub » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:23 am

ponyinNC wrote:i see $4.4MM as well.

And here's a question for my law school buddies tha paid attention in employment law...

is it possible to have a non-compete clause in the buyout?? How would that work?? Isn't A&M on our future schedule??


arkansas just put a noncompete in bobby petrino's contract. if he leaves he cant go to SEC west for 5 years
jackspub
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:04 pm

Postby SMU Football Blog » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:24 am

User avatar
SMU Football Blog
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4418
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: North Dallas, Texas

Postby QuikSStang » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:30 am

thanks blog. i thought since he resigned and A&M moved on to someone else, the buyout would be terminated
Image
User avatar
QuikSStang
Heisman
 
Posts: 1519
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Dalla$

Postby SMUMan02 » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:32 am

ponyinNC wrote:i see $4.4MM as well.

And here's a question for my law school buddies tha paid attention in employment law...

is it possible to have a non-compete clause in the buyout?? How would that work?? Isn't A&M on our future schedule??


Cuban tried this theory in his suit with Nellie. His claim is that Nellie breached his noncompete by tanning the Mavericks hide in the playoffs. I don't have a case number or anything or I'd reference it, but it was filed in Dallas County.
Class of '02
User avatar
SMUMan02
All-American
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:08 am
Location: Tyler, TX

Postby SMU Football Blog » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:35 am

Buyout is over $4,000,000.00 to be paid in monthly installments over 3 years. Fran has duty to mitigate damages in years 2 & 3. In other words if he coached at SMU, any $$$ he made in years 2 and 3 would be subtracted from the $$$ A&M has to pay Fran.

Now, if SMU wanted to get cute, they could offer Fran a 5 year deal and pay Fran:

Year 1: $1,000,000.00
Year 2: $100,000.00
Year 3: $100,000.00
Year 4: $2,000,000.00
Year 5: $2,000,000.00

If I were A&M, I would sue Fran over that but you could try to do it.

A more reasonable way to do it would be a low base with heavy bonuses. Pay $500,000.00 per year; give him $1,000,000.00 signing bonus and large bonuses for bowls, attendance, graduation rates, and perhaps a guaranteed option for a sixth year at $2,000,000.00.
User avatar
SMU Football Blog
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4418
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: North Dallas, Texas

Postby mrydel » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:36 am

SMU Football Blog wrote:Buyout is over $4,000,000.00 to be paid in monthly installments over 3 years. Fran has duty to mitigate damages in years 2 & 3. In other words if he coached at SMU, any $$$ he made in years 2 and 3 would be subtracted from the $$$ A&M has to pay Fran.

Now, if SMU wanted to get cute, they could offer Fran a 5 year deal and pay Fran:

Year 1: $1,000,000.00
Year 2: $100,000.00
Year 3: $100,000.00
Year 4: $2,000,000.00
Year 5: $2,000,000.00

If I were A&M, I would sue Fran over that but you could try to do it.

A more reasonable way to do it would be a low base with heavy bonuses. Pay $500,000.00 per year; give him $1,000,000.00 signing bonus and large bonuses for bowls, attendance, graduation rates, and perhaps a guaranteed option for a sixth year at $2,000,000.00.


And a solid buy out clause.
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Postby SMU2007 » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:37 am

thanks for the advice Stallion. I'll be sure to take it.

jackas's
User avatar
SMU2007
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5561
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:41 am

Postby Aston94 » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:39 am

Fran's buy-out has a good faith clause, the pay structure you are suggesting would indicate a lack of good faith and would never fly.
Aston94
Newbie
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:13 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Advice: Get This Done Now

Postby SMUFan » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:40 am

Stallion wrote:if SMU wants Fran I sure hope they proceed quickly. Just a reminder-the lay of the land could change in hours as quickly as rumors spread on the UCLA and West Virgina jobs and the puddles they may cause. What happens when the NFL Coaches start getting fired. I see scenarios in which SMU could once again be jilted at the alter. Whoever is the target needs to be tied down. This false sense of security that Orsini talks about in the "Dead Period" is a mirage. But hey we'll always have Coker because no body would be dumb enough to offer him a job.
I can't see why so many people think a guy who goes 60-15 and wins a national championship would be a "dumb" hire. My guess is that if Coker gets hired again, either at SMU or elsewhere, it is the folks at Rice who will look dumb for letting financial considerations get in the way of bringing him to Houston. Yes, he inherited talent at UM. He also got them to perform at a high level. The NCAA history books are filled with talented teams that underachieve, and the blame for many of those has to fall at least in part at the feet of their coaches. So Coker isn't 33 years old, or a Texan. Put some coaches on his staff with Texas recruiting ties, and my guess is we could do a whole lot worse. He's a proven winner, and winning is what each of us wants, right?
User avatar
SMUFan
All-American
 
Posts: 796
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Addison, Texas

Postby SMU Football Blog » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:41 am

Aston94 wrote:Fran's buy-out has a good faith clause, the pay structure you are suggesting would indicate a lack of good faith and would never fly.


Which is why I said A&M would probably sue Fran over it. :wink:

I think the second contract I proposed would work.

But that is a Fran problem, not an SMU problem, unless SMU agreed to indemnify Fran for it, which would be stupid.
User avatar
SMU Football Blog
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4418
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: North Dallas, Texas

Re: Advice: Get This Done Now

Postby Longtime » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:48 am

SMUFan wrote:Yes, he inherited talent at UM. He also got them to perform at a high level. The NCAA history books are filled with talented teams that underachieve, and the blame for many of those has to fall at least in part at the feet of their coaches.


The history books are also full of mediocre coaches who won championships because of overwhelming talent.

Coaching Miami with an NFL roster is a lot different from building a program at SMU. It takes energy and vision, and I don't see either in Coker. Nice guy, though.
User avatar
Longtime
All-American
 
Posts: 756
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Next

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests