What the BCS Matchups Should Have Been

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Big Hoss
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3183
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:02 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Post by Big Hoss »

Interesting points, all of them. I just have not been sold on the idea that there is a bonafide solution for all the arguments people have today with the current system.

HOLY CRAP BATMAN, HAWAII ACTUALLY SCORED A TD!
User avatar
couch 'em
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 9758
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Farmers Branch

Post by couch 'em »

Why introduce opinions into it at all? Have a playoff with just conference champions, and one spot for the highest rated independent? Everyone else can play in a non-playoff bowl game.

If you allow only conference champions, we'll see conferences start realigning as top teams move down to weaker conferences to get into the playoffs easier. Everyone wins.
Pony Soup
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

Post by Pony Soup »

there is certainly no perfect answer...
Big Hoss
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3183
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:02 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Post by Big Hoss »

firephil wrote:there is certainly no perfect answer...


We certainly agree on that.
User avatar
J.T.supporta
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6160
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: SMU

Post by J.T.supporta »

couch 'em wrote:Why introduce opinions into it at all? Have a playoff with just conference champions, and one spot for the highest rated independent? Everyone else can play in a non-playoff bowl game.

If you allow only conference champions, we'll see conferences start realigning as top teams move down to weaker conferences to get into the playoffs easier. Everyone wins.


coaches/ADs/schools/presidents wont be down for that. remember, we need a system where there wont be a possibility of taking away money from people.

either have a bowl system plus 1 or have a playoff and thats it...
Pony Soup
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

Post by Pony Soup »

couch 'em wrote:Why introduce opinions into it at all? Have a playoff with just conference champions, and one spot for the highest rated independent? Everyone else can play in a non-playoff bowl game.

If you allow only conference champions, we'll see conferences start realigning as top teams move down to weaker conferences to get into the playoffs easier. Everyone wins.


because there is too much money involved to get that structure implemented? And if there are at-large spots, schools would schedule highly ranked opponents for n-c games, which equals MO MONEY
User avatar
couch 'em
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 9758
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Farmers Branch

Post by couch 'em »

I don't see how it will take money away from anyone. If you have two top 10 teams who are both #2 in their conference coming together for a bowl game, you can make just as much money of TV et. al. as you do now. Keeping the playoff small, yet fair to all (conference champs only) will keep the bowl system strong by keeping strong teams in the bowls.
Pony Soup
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

Post by Pony Soup »

that's a fair point, but I dont think the schools, etc would ever go for that. They dont really seem to think ab this whole thing the way fans do
User avatar
J.T.supporta
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6160
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: SMU

Post by J.T.supporta »

couch 'em wrote:I don't see how it will take money away from anyone. If you have two top 10 teams who are both #2 in their conference coming together for a bowl game, you can make just as much money of TV et. al. as you do now. Keeping the playoff small, yet fair to all (conference champs only) will keep the bowl system strong by keeping strong teams in the bowls.


it will be too confusing to describe what i want to say so ill say this, the playoff structure all depends on Notre Dame. get them in a conference and there will be a playoff system.
Pony Soup
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

Post by Pony Soup »

J.T.supporta wrote:
couch 'em wrote:I don't see how it will take money away from anyone. If you have two top 10 teams who are both #2 in their conference coming together for a bowl game, you can make just as much money of TV et. al. as you do now. Keeping the playoff small, yet fair to all (conference champs only) will keep the bowl system strong by keeping strong teams in the bowls.


it will be too confusing to describe what i want to say so ill say this, the playoff structure all depends on Notre Dame. get them in a conference and there will be a playoff system.


When I considered ND, I decided we should go to a playoff and tell them finish in the top 4-5 of the non conf-champs or join a conference. Up to them.
User avatar
J.T.supporta
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6160
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: SMU

Post by J.T.supporta »

firephil wrote:
J.T.supporta wrote:
couch 'em wrote:I don't see how it will take money away from anyone. If you have two top 10 teams who are both #2 in their conference coming together for a bowl game, you can make just as much money of TV et. al. as you do now. Keeping the playoff small, yet fair to all (conference champs only) will keep the bowl system strong by keeping strong teams in the bowls.


it will be too confusing to describe what i want to say so ill say this, the playoff structure all depends on Notre Dame. get them in a conference and there will be a playoff system.


When I considered ND, I decided we should go to a playoff and tell them finish in the top 4-5 of the non conf-champs or join a conference. Up to them.


wish that would work but it wont...we both know that. get them in a conference, make each conference 12-14 teams deep, play 8 conference games with 1 conference championship game, then have an 8 team playoff system with bowl games from the next best 56 teams
Pony Soup
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

Post by Pony Soup »

User avatar
QuikSStang
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1519
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Dalla$

Post by QuikSStang »

wow, i didnt realize this much conversation would come from that.

all i want are some good matchups on New Year's Day. we ended up with two blowouts and overmatched games, this year because of crappy selection committees.
Image
User avatar
J.T.supporta
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6160
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: SMU

Post by J.T.supporta »

QuikSStang wrote:wow, i didnt realize this much conversation would come from that.

all i want are some good matchups on New Year's Day. we ended up with two blowouts and overmatched games, this year because of crappy selection committees.


it happens, its hit or miss...i remember the worst BCS game i ever saw was the Utah blowout, atleast these games were worth watching
User avatar
GOOSE-1995
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Plano, Texas
Contact:

Post by GOOSE-1995 »

I completely agree that they need playoff system.

The only team that got really screwed was Missouri. Other than that…the bowl selection committee did fine. Based on a chaos that happened during the regular season, how could anyone predict the games would be blowouts? I certainly think that the committee thought the games would be competitive. Besides we have three games left…all could be as good as the “Citrus Bowlâ€
"Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything. 14% of people know that."

Homer Simpson
Post Reply