Maybe the Cowboys should get a new QB

by **mustangbill67** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:25 pm

mr. pony wrote:Romo-dope.

Good to see arrogant swagger take it in the shorts.

Nothing wrong with arrogant swagger becasuse you have to earn it. Wish the Ponies had it!

by **mrydel** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:25 pm

Big Hoss wrote:They showed a stat that said the #1 seed had not lost it's first game since the playoffs went to this format in 1990. What do you know, another first for the Cowboys!

I may be wrong but I think it was the Cowboys had never lost as a #1 seed since 1990. Even so, if your statement is true, the Colts beat the Cowboys to the record.

by **Big Hoss** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:27 pm

mrydel wrote:
Big Hoss wrote:They showed a stat that said the #1 seed had not lost it's first game since the playoffs went to this format in 1990. What do you know, another first for the Cowboys!

I may be wrong but I think it was the Cowboys had never lost as a #1 seed since 1990. Even so, if your statement is true, the Colts beat the Cowboys to the record.

The Colts were the #2 seed in the AFC. Remember, the Patriots were 16-0.

Also, the Cowboys had not won a playoff game in 11 years. Another statement they made during the game.

by **mrydel** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:28 pm

Big Hoss wrote:
mrydel wrote:
Big Hoss wrote:They showed a stat that said the #1 seed had not lost it's first game since the playoffs went to this format in 1990. What do you know, another first for the Cowboys!

I may be wrong but I think it was the Cowboys had never lost as a #1 seed since 1990. Even so, if your statement is true, the Colts beat the Cowboys to the record.

The Colts were the #2 seed in the AFC. Remember, the Patriots were 16-0.

Also, the Cowboys had not won a playoff game in 11 years. Another statement they made during the game.

I got ya. I thought they were referring to "bye" teams rather than the actual #1 seed. Nevermind.

by **Big Hoss** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:29 pm

No problem mrydel

by **angryfan04** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:57 pm

Kicking game lost this....gave up too many return yards....poor tackling....offside penalties were huge....and the defense giving up that TD at the end of the half hurt....

by **George S. Patton** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:01 pm

angryfan04 wrote:Kicking game lost this....gave up too many return yards....poor tackling....offside penalties were huge....and the defense giving up that TD at the end of the half hurt....

Yes, all cowboy fans should thank Jacque Reeves for the PF facemask penalty -- as the WR receiver was going out of bounds (if the radio call was correct) -- that pretty much put the giants in point blank range.

by **McAndless** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:12 pm

Romo's great when expectations are low.

He's not a clutch performer or natural leader amongst his teammates.

He's not a closer, including with celebrities.

Other than that, he has 30 million more guaranteed reasons to laugh than I will have tomorrow morning, so that has to count for something.

by **smu diamond m** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:24 pm

McAndless wrote:Romo's great when expectations are low.

He's not a clutch performer or natural leader amongst his teammates.

He's not a closer, including with celebrities.

Other than that, he has 30 million more guaranteed reasons to laugh than I will have tomorrow morning, so that has to count for something.

I think J Simpson was plenty open, and he's doing no closing.

by **Junior** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:48 pm

angryfan04 wrote:Kicking game lost this....gave up too many return yards....poor tackling....offside penalties were huge....and the defense giving up that TD at the end of the half hurt....

Didn't Justin Rodgers get hit with a holding call on a return?

by **Big Hoss** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:51 pm

Junior wrote:
angryfan04 wrote:Kicking game lost this....gave up too many return yards....poor tackling....offside penalties were huge....and the defense giving up that TD at the end of the half hurt....

Didn't Justin Rodgers get hit with a holding call on a return?

Block in the back, actually.

by **Junior** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:53 pm

Big Hoss wrote:
Junior wrote:
angryfan04 wrote:Kicking game lost this....gave up too many return yards....poor tackling....offside penalties were huge....and the defense giving up that TD at the end of the half hurt....

Didn't Justin Rodgers get hit with a holding call on a return?

Block in the back, actually.

Gotcha. I knew it was something like that.

by **Hilltopper** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:52 am

How's Romo going to react to the pictures of Jessica Simpson on her next tropical getaway ... with Eli Manning?

by **Big Hoss** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:02 am

He can use any one of the millions of dollars from his new contract to wipe away his tears, or put several of them together to attract a new trophy girlfriend.

by **mr. pony** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:55 am

Junior wrote:
George S. Patton wrote:I know this sounds a lot like a McClown thread, but after what their QB has done and that motion that's ridiculous, it might be time for them to really evaluate if he is the QB who can get it done or if they need to look in another direction.

C'mon General, you're better than that.

I'm in agreement with the General.

Romo is a flash-in-the-pan doofus.
I don't remember Aikman, Staubach or Montana (all qbs Romo has been ridiculously compared with) ever failing so miserably in playoff games or being so completely caught up in their own celebrity. :shock:

Maybe the Cowboys should get a new QB

Re: Maybe the Cowboys should get a new QB

Who is online