Streak

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

[El][Topo]
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:15 am

Post by [El][Topo] »

Junior wrote:Of course people in Idaho are rich. What the heck can you spend your money on there?


Spud cannons for the whole family?

Image
'08
huskerpony
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2962
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:07 pm

Post by huskerpony »

BrentMusburger wrote:
mustangbill67 wrote:Although I have not had the opportunity to spend some time there, I understand that if you are into outdoor activities (backpacking, climbing, fishing,etc) Idaho has a lot to offer. It is on my list of places to adventure in.


Go to Montana instead


The panhandle--does that qualify as a panhandle? I don't know--anyway, the skinny part at the top is great if you're into the outdoors and Coeur d'Alene is a pretty cool town. The rest of the state just has potatoes and mormons.

But I agree, Montana is much better.
SWC2010
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1220
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: TEXAS

Post by SWC2010 »

Junior wrote:
Paladin wrote:Why no love for Idaho on ponyfans.com?

"Idaho, however, with 26.65 millionaires per 1,000 population, has the highest per capita ratio of any state, largely because of the soaring price of land on its many large farms. Maine, a longtime retreat of the rich, is second with 7.72 millionaires per 1,000, while North Dakota, with its sprawling farms and ranches, is third with 6.9. The states with the lowest concentrations of seven-figure citizens: Arkansas, with .34 millionaires per 1,000, and Wyoming, where the ratio is just .19. Nonetheless, to reverse Scott Fitzgerald's famous dictum, just about everywhere the rich are becoming less and less distinguishable from everyone else."


Of course people in Idaho are rich. What the heck can you spend your money on there?


Taking Jr's logic a step further, Lubbock must be wall-to-wall millionaires...
Post Reply